Dogs In Review Magazine September 2016 | Page 17

BETWEEN THE LINES More on Critiques I And of course judging would be slower and more expenhave been writing a lot about critiques recently. Judging sive, but critiques would only be offered at specific shows or by the reaction from readers, I need to write more. The in certain classes, and the extra fee that I’m sure exhibitors written critiques that the conformation judges dictate BO are willing to pay would easily finance the costs. (Entry fees for each exhibit in the ring at FCI shows in Europe are exBENGTSON at FCI shows in Europe are considerably higher than ours, but tremely popular in some quarters but considered a waste of they still have much bigger shows than we do!) paper by others. Then there is what’s apparently the most insurmountaIt was my original contention that these written “word picble problem — a stumbling block that I had not foreseen tures” from the judge’s mouth could be a saving grace for dog at all. American dog show exhibitors, shows in the US and help attract badly it was said, would simply not be able needed fresh blood to the dog fancy. If to accept having their dogs criticized we don’t do anything and entry figures Written critiques in print by a judge, however expertly. continue to plummet, dog shows as that conformation Anything less than 100 percent positive we know them may become extinct in judges dictate ... remarks would be considered a mortal the US sooner than we think. We need insult. That surprised me a lot. Have we more people getting involved in showat FCI shows are become so emotional about our pets ing dogs, and to achieve that end, we extremely popular. that we can’t accept that they may not need to figure out how to attract them be absolutely perfect in terms of conto “our world.” Because critiques are formation? (The judge won’t comment obviously appreciated in the countries on the dog’s character, as long as it doesn’t bite or shy away where they are obligatory, and because dog shows are so big from examination.) in those countries — where showing dogs really is a sort of Does it matter so much to us that our dogs have perfect “family sport” in a way they are not over here — it would conformation? Are we so different from exhibitors overseas, seem natural to follow their lead in this respect. where they nod and agree when the judge tells them their dogs’ faults? Have dog people become much more sensitive All the Reasons Why Not than exhibitors of other domestic animals, where the exhibiThe reaction to my suggestion that critiques might be a good tor has to accept sometimes quite severe verbal critiques from idea at AKC shows was mostly negative at first. Critiques the judge, expressed for everyone to hear during judging? wouldn’t have anything to teach those of us who consider ourWould it help if we referred to the critiques as “descriptions” selves experts, and anyway, one critique would probably conor “assessments” instead, so it didn’t sound so … well, critical? tradict another. Most judges wouldn’t know enough to have an opinion, and even those who did would not be able to express themselves clearly. The critiques would take a lot of time for There Is a Desire for Critiques judges to dictate, so they wouldn’t be able to take on When I posted a question on my Facebook page about whethas many dogs per day as they do now — which in er dog people would be interested in getting critiques, the return means that more judges wou ld be needed sponse, in spite of the above, was almost universally positive. PERCENT OF for each event, making it even more expen[We also asked this question on the Dogs in Review Facebook DOGS IN REVIEW FACEBOOK sive to put on a show than it is now. page, and 72 percent of respondents said they did want criFANS WHO WANT CRITIQUES: To all this, my response is that trying tiques. — Eds.] Here are some of the comments I received: anything is better than nothing because we quite obviously have little to lose. If “Yes, I want to know the judge’s opinion of my dog.” we think a judge is qualified enough for us to show under him or her, surely we must “This would be a huge improvement in so many ways.” be willing to listen to that judge’s reasons for “I really can’t believe that they don’t do it yet!” a placement. Yes, some critiques would state the “I’ve said for a long time that written critiques would be opposite of others, but so what? That just teaches us, a first but major step to reviving our sport.” if we didn’t know it before, that judges don’t always agree. Sure, some judges would be better at expressing themselves than others — just as some of them are already better than others in different areas of the judging process. CONTINUED ON PAGE 108 72% 14 DOGSinREVIEW.com 14_Bengtson.indd 14 8/17/16 11:45 AM