Dogs In Review Magazine July 2017 | Page 21

BETWEEN THE LINES BO BENGTSON line to improve type. s long as dog shows, stud books and pedigree Who knows, those “out- records have existed, successful breeders of crosses” may also have purebred dogs have mostly followed the same introduced an extra, very formula: linebreed or inbreed to the best individuals, necessary dose of strength concentrate the bloodlines and outcross only when nec- and vitality. essary. (And even those “outcrosses” are generally, if you How long can you keep in- and look further back in the pedigrees, based on the same linebreeding within a closed gene foundation dogs many times over). When you look at old pool without producing ill effects? A pedigrees, it’s amazing how close those early breeders dozen generations? Twenty or thirty? dared to go: half-brother to half- sister, even full siblings I am not a geneticist, but it’s clear even to bred together; sire to daughter, grandsire to granddaugh- me that when you’re breeding closely relat- ter with an uncle thrown in on the “unrelated” side, ed dogs in an attempt etc. etc. It says a lot for the basic to “set” some desir- soundness of the foundation stock of able characteristic, most breeds that there were seldom Of course, breeders you may inadvertent- visible ill effects of all this close in the past believed ly also double up on breeding. These dogs’ backgrounds a few things that you usually varied considerably; in many strongly in the don’t want and that breeds their pedigrees were some- “survival of the may not be immedi- times unknown well into the 20th fi ttest” theory: ately visible to the century, and close inbreeding was naked eye. necessary to “set” the breed type. they were a lot less Modern science tells emotional than we us that most genetic Changing Mores are today about the disorders in dogs are Of course breeders in the past also caused by a single gene believed strongly in the “survival of odd puppy that was that was somehow damaged the fittest” theory: they were a lot not doing well. but remains hidden and has less emotional than we are today no ill effects as long as the about the odd puppy that was not animal also has a copy of the nor- doing well. We don’t discard a single mal gene. Things get serious when this damaged gene puppy if we can help it—and with modern veterinary becomes common enough in a breed that two apparently care we usually can help it; in those days they would healthy animals, both with a copy of the damaged gene, just, to use a blunt but very descriptive term, “bucket” are bred together and their offspring has to suffer the such a puppy. If it wasn’t strong and thriving it wasn’t consequences. worth fussing over, and it did not grow up to propagate Apparently genetic disorders in dogs caused by these the species. recessive mutations usually appear suddenly: “I’ve never In the early days there was also in many breeds a seen this before,” you say, genuinely surprised when silently accepted, but almost never openly discussed, encountering a “new” problem in a litter or an adult dog. habit of