Diplomatist Magazine Diplomatist April-May 2019 | Page 71

IN FOCUS Summit witnessed the signing of 15 deals between Nepali (as JV Partner) and foreign companies. Similarly, out of 77 projects presented by the government before international companies, there were only 17 applications for 10 projects (Kathmandu Ring Road Bus Rapid Transit Project; Tamor Storage Project; Dhulikhel Medicity; West Seti Hydropower Project; Nijgadh International Airport; International Convention Centre, Bhaktapur; Integrated Agriculture Infrastructure Project Banepa & Chitwan Integrated Agriculture Infrastructure Project Hemja; and Integrated Agriculture Infrastructure Project Urlabari). Strikingly, the Chaudhary Group, a home-grown conglomerate proved to be the most impactful deal- maker by making four joint-venture agreements in Solar Power, Logistics Park, and Mobile Network Service. Reportedly, the Chaudhary Group has entered into a joint venture agreement with Sharaf Group to develop a multi-modal logistics park and 600MW solar photovoltaic project with the US-based Sky Power. Of this 600MW deal, a 200MW solar power project is in the pipeline in Province 2, near Janakpur. To enter the telecom sector, CG LifeCell announced a joint venture agreement with Istanbul- based Turkcell for 5G mobile network service. For the already existing Arun-III Hydropower Project, the Nepalese and Indian fi nancial institutions made the much-needed commitment of Rs 78.59 billion. The 900 MW fl edgling project would also receive additional fi nancial assurance of Rs 65.60 billion from the State Bank of India and Rs 8.12 billion and Rs 4.87 billion from Nepal’s Everest Bank and Nabil Bank respectively. The 216 MW Upper Trishuli 1 hydroelectricity project had received an investment of $650 million. The policy decisions from Nepal Electricity Authority Board (NEAB) proved as a catalyst in this regard. The World Bank’s International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) will fi nance the project. As part of a critical energy deal, a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) was signed between China’s Yunnan Xinhua Water Conservancy and Hydropower Investment Co Ltd and Nepal’s Hydro Solution for the 164 MW Kali Gandaki Gorge Project. The Special Economic Zone (SEZ) being a new idea for Nepal made news when a project was initiated in Bhairahawa, bordering India though it is not yet operational. The IBN, IFC and SEZ Authority entered an institutional collaboration for developing SEZ in Simara through Public-Private Partnership (PPP). Notwithstanding the euphoria, the offi cial fi gure shows that after the formation of the new government, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has gone down which is a matter of concern for the government. According to data provided by the Department of Industry, Government of Nepal, the FDI dropped down by 63 percent in the fi rst eight months of the fi scal year 2018-19 as compared to the same period last year. Nepal received an FDI commitment of Rs 34.9 billion between mid-July and mid-February in 2017-18; the total FDI commitment in the corresponding period this fi scal plummeted to Rs 11.25 billion. In the previous Nepal Investment Summit held in 2017, international investors pledged to invest Rs 1,446 billion of which a quarter has not been realized yet. According to a survey released by Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), Nepal’s central bank, in June 2018, FDI infl ows in Nepal were substantially low as compared to its neighbouring countries. It shares only a meagre 0.01 percent of the total FDI in the world while South Asia received 3.1 percent of total FDI infl ows in 2016. “Foreign investors from 39 countries have made investments in 252 fi rms in Nepal. India is the main investor in Nepal in terms of paid up capital. However, West Indies comes ahead of India if we consider total stock of FDI by including reserves and loans,” states the NRB report. It also outlined that most of the FDI in Nepal comes from tax haven countries which means that Nepalese businessmen acquired money in those countries through illegal means and channelized that money as FDI in Nepal. However, there are numerous reasons behind the low infl ux of FDI in Nepal. Nepal was marred by a long cycle of insurgency, political violence and instability tilted towards economic liberalisation in 1990. One of the stumbling blocks to foreign investment during the insurgency period was the strike and closure of factories by trade unions which were uncommunicative towards political parties. With the inception of the peace process in 2006 which offi cially ended the violent insurgency of Maoists, the FDI gradually began to be generated in Nepal. For more than a decade, the country faced a colossal power outrage which also became one of the key factors for The Special Economic Zone (SEZ) being a new idea for Nepal made news when a project was initiated in Bhairahawa, bordering India though it is not yet operational. The IBN, IFC and SEZ Authority entered an institutional collaboration for developing SEZ in Simara through Public-Private Partnership (PPP). Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Diplomatist • Vol 7 • Issue 4 • April-May 2019, Noida • 71