Diplomatist Magazine Diplomatist April-May 2019 | Page 10

COUNTRY FOCUS DUTCH COURAGE IS THE NETHERLANDS OVERCONFIDENT IN ITS EU INFLUENCE? BY JOSEF JANNING* S hould you be searching for a strong case of the power of smaller states in the European Union, look no further: the Netherlands is the best example of a country punching above its economic or demographic weight. And this is in spite of its reluctance towards a more profound integration. The Netherlands has the sixth largest economy in the EU, ranks seventh in defence spending, and is eighth in population size. But the Dutch come in fourth out of 28 – behind only Germany, France, and Italy – in terms of relevance as measured by ECFR’s EU Coalition Explorer, even though their (and Italy’s) commitment to deeper integration is generally viewed to be the weakest of the founding EU members. Policymakers and planners in The Hague currently have cause to review their country’s place and role in its interactions with member states. After all, Brexit means that an important ally and like-minded partner on issues ranging from security to trade is leaving the bloc. For Dutch diplomacy, this implies a growing dependence on its closest partner, Germany. Relations with Berlin are already crucial to Dutch EU policymaking. As the Coalition Explorer shows, the ties between both countries are mutually strong — for Germany, the Netherlands is its most important EU partner after France. Relying on that link alone, however, could be too narrow a base to satisfy the traditional inclination of the Dutch political class to balance its relations with Germany — and, on top of that, to achieve some counterweight to the Franco-German axis. Close ties with Britain have served that purpose well over many years, even though the British opt- outs from the euro and Schengen already weakened London’s weight in the balance. Furthermore, a reliance on Germany alone could devalue the bilateral link in the eyes of Berlin — a close partner with additional options would certainly count more than one without such alternatives. With Britain out, the Netherlands will want to develop alternative options. If the Franco-German tandem cannot be balanced without Britain, then possibly a closer relationship with France might achieve something in the Dutch interest. Getting one’s interests recognised in Paris, and being seen as a valuable partner there, could help to secure the Dutch position. An analysis of the interaction preferences of both countries shows the current weakness of this link. When it comes to the density of contact between the two, The Hague’s focus on Paris is strong (weaker only than that on Germany and Belgium), but the French response is weak. However, on shared interest and responsiveness, the relationship between the Netherlands and France is insignifi cant — it does not show up in the list of Dutch preferred partners at all. While Paris — and Berlin — view The Hague as among the top fi ve most infl uential EU member states in general, at 7 percent respective readings for both countries are slightly lower than that of all capitals taken together (9 percent). They are also signifi cantly lower than the self-assessment of the Dutch professional class, which sees their country at 15 percent. On the upside, the French view the Netherlands as the most infl uential among the highly affl uent smaller member states of the EU: the Benelux countries, the Nordic countries, and Austria. Thus, in the lead of closer cooperation between these countries, and possibly adding others such as Ireland, Portugal, the Baltics, or Slovenia, the Dutch role could grow 10 • Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Diplomatist • Vol 7 • Issue 4 • April-May 2019, Noida