Diplomatist Magazine Annual Edition 2018 | Page 39

Knowledge Partner Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Diplomatist T he on-going Israeli-Pales*nian conflict between the state of Israel and the stateless Pales*nians seeking a state of their own began much before the establishment of Israel in 1948. For years ajer the 1917 Balfour Declara*on, Muslims and Jews in Pales*ne, then under the mandate of the UK, con*nued to live in reasonable peace. It was only when the Jewish immigra*on increased rapidly, and it became clear that the Zionists wanted a Jewish state in Pales*ne that tensions between the two communi*es led to violent confronta*ons. Arabs. Fourth, the Pales*nians have always been outwiQed by the Israelis at the conference table. Last, but not the least, Israel has not been sincere in its search for a peace-based on compromise, justness and fairness to both sides. Before seeking an explana*on for the signal failure of diplomacy to resolve the Israeli-Pales*nian conflict, it is necessary to recall a few points. First, both sides have resorted to propaganda, but Israel has succeeded much beQer in influencing public opinion in its favour even when it has no case. Scholars and the media have bought the Israeli propaganda knowingly or otherwise. For example, the public, especially the young, is not aware that the Zionists successfully resorted to terrorism to beget their state. There are histories of Israel by reputed scholars omiqng to men*on the bombing of the King David Hotel on 22 July 1946 in which 91 people were killed, including 41 Pales*nian Arabs, 28 Bri*sh, and 17 Jews. The aQack was carried out by Irgun (Na*onal Military Organisa*on in the Land of Israel). Chaim Weizmann—who subsequently became the first president of Israel— living in London, told Labour MP Richard Crossman, “I can't help feeling proud of our boys. If only it had been a German headquarters, they would have goQen the Victoria Cross.” On 16 September 1948, the then Both sides have resorted to Un i t e d Na * o n s Me d i a t o r i n propaganda, but Israel has Pales*ne, Count Folke BernadoQe, succeeded much beaer in was murdered in cold blood by Lehi influencing public opinion in (Freedom Fighters for Israel). During the war, as head of the its favour even when it has Swedish Red Cross, Count no case. Scholars and the BernadoQe had saved thousands of media have bought the Jews. As a UN peace mediator, Israeli propaganda Count BernadoQe had proposed some modifica*ons to the UN knowingly or otherwise. Par**on Plan which were seen as disadvantageous to Israel. Before the assassina*on, Lehi carried out a disinforma*on campaign against him by branding him as a Bri*sh agent who had collaborated with the Nazis. Yitzhak Shamir was part of the small group that arranged for the assassina*on. Although Lehi was subsequently disbanded, Shamir was never tried and he eventually went on to become Israel's prime minister (1983-84 and 1986-1992). However, the Jewish Virtual Library s*ll says that Shamir “reportedly played a role" [Italics added for emphasis]. Image 16: The explosion of a second bomb at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on 22 July 1946, by the militant Zionist underground organisaLon, the Irgun, on the BriLsh administraLve headquarters for PalesLne, which was housed in the southern wing of the Hotel Israel-PLO Talks and the Oslo Accords Pales*ne Libera*on Organisa*on (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat had been asking Norway to arrange for talks since 1979. In 1990, Arafat’s support for Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein, when the laQer invaded Kuwait cost the PLO dearly. The Gulf Coopera*on Council (GCC) stopped its funding, Arafat was sta*oned in Tunis, and his leadership was not fully accepted in Pales*ne. Finally, the first round of talks between Israel and the PLO took place in 1993 and was arranged by Norway. The talks, held in small towns in Norway, were secret. Ini*ally there was no official Israeli representa*ve and a draj Declara*on of Principles (DoP) was drawn up. Meanwhile, Israel was playing a clever game. It sent an official nego*ator and changed the DoP draj to its advantage. For instance, the draj had previously provided for interna*onal arbitra*on and for UN or Egypt to take charge Third, the support for Zionists from the West has been more consistent and more reliable as compared to what the Pales*nians got from their fellow 28