Dialogue Volume 12 Issue 3 2016 | Page 47

discipline summaries Text of Public Reprimand Dr. Noriega, the Committee has found that you committed the most serious form of professional misconduct, the sexual abuse of a young adolescent patient in your care. Your misconduct must be denounced in the strongest terms. You misused your position of trust and authority with respect to this unfortunate and disadvantaged young girl, for your own selfish interests. As a pediatrician you were well aware of your privileged status with respect to a vulnerable adolescent in your care. Yet you chose to victimize this troubled young girl with no apparent concern for the grievous harm which you caused. This harm is not limited to the trauma which was inflicted on this individual patient, but extends widely to include the medical community and the public at large. The maintenance of public trust in the integrity of the profession, and of confidence in the College’s ability to protect the public from predatory and abusive physicians, are dealt a serious blow by your misconduct. The Committee is truly disturbed by your behaviour. This is a very unfortunate way for you to end your medical career. You will be remembered as a physician who violated the trust of his patient in a most egregious and offensive fashion. We can only hope that, on reflection, you can learn to take responsibility for your misconduct, and to come to terms with the harm that you have done. DR. GEORGE WILLIAMS OTTO Practice Location: Toronto Practice Area: General Practice Hearing Information: Agreed Statement of Facts, Admission, Joint Submission on Penalty On October 5, 2015, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Otto committed acts of professional misconduct, in that he has failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession; and he has engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. Dr. Otto admitted to the allegations. In March 2012, the Ministry of Health and LongTerm Care expressed concerns to the College regard- ing Dr. Otto’s completion of Special Diet Allowance (SDA) applications. The Ministry reviewed 25 patient records which were selected based on claim submissions of an assessment code and a code for completing an application for a SDA. The records submitted were for families where all of the patients within the family were billed on the same service date. Fifteen of the records were for patients 18 years of age and under. The Ministry’s review revealed that of those 15 records, 13 records included the phrase ‘anceiform rash all over body’ and also noted an opinion of lactose intolerance or milk allergy. Based on the information received from the Ministry, the College commenced an investigation. In the course of its investigation, the College received billings for the 25 patients reviewed by the Ministry. The College retained the services of an expert, Dr. X, who opined that of the 24 charts she reviewed, only three met the standard of care with respect to the completion of the SDA application forms. In general, documentation and investigations to support the conditions indicated in the SDA forms were lacking. It was also noted that many patients had frequent assessments over a very short period of time, prior to the completion of the SDA forms, and that many of the clinical entries for those repeat assessments were identical. During the College’s investigation, in November 2012, Dr. Otto participated in a medical record-keeping course and submitted proof of completion to the College. In May 2014, Dr. X reviewed 10 additional records of Dr. Otto and found that four of them did not meet the standard of care of the profession in relation to his completion of SDA forms, in that there was no documentation of the symptoms, investigations or treatment recommendations to support the condition(s) reported on the SDA form. However, Dr. X noted improvement with regards to Dr. Otto’s charting and patient assessments that were conducted to support the clinical conditions indicated in the SDA and to satisfy the requirements of the Ministry when completing the SDA forms, and that Dr. Otto provided sound rationale for supporting dietary and Full decisions are available online at www.cpso.on.ca. Select Doctor Search and enter the doctor’s name. Issue 3, 2016 Dialogue 47