Dialogue Volume 12 Issue 1 2016 | Page 5

MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Colleagues: I Joel Kirsh, MD College President photo: D.W. Dorken I am pleased that we have provided a document that is clear, thoughtful and helpful. n my first letter to you as President of this College, I am pleased to have the opportunity to address our recently approved guidance document which was developed in response to the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision on physician-assisted death. Few issues are as emotionallycharged and morally complex as physician-assisted death, so I am pleased that we have provided a document that is clear, thoughtful and helpful. In arriving at its decision to strike down laws prohibiting physicianassisted death, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that an individual’s response to intolerable suffering is a matter critical to dignity and autonomy. It is the profound respect that physicians have for our patients and for their experiences that informs the College’s Interim Guidance document. The Interim Guidance – which can be found on page 11 – is a bridging document to ensure that you are prepared to respond to your patients’ questions while the federal and provincial government consider how it will respond to the Carter vs Canada decision. As you may know, in June of this year, competent adults who are suffering intolerably with a grievous and irremediable medical condition will be able to seek assistance in dying from physicians. Until June 6th, physician-assisted death is accessible only to individuals who receive an exemption from the Superior Court of Justice. This decision marks a huge change for medicine and for its practitioners. But it represents an even bigger change for patients. Simply having this option available to them – whether or not they ever wish to pursue it – is absolutely key. People want to have a sense of control over their lives. Given this new landscape, you may be thinking about your patients and how you would respond if any of them requested your assistance. Our guidance makes it clear that while you do not have to assist your patient in dying, you still have a responsibility to your patient. If you decline to assist a patient in dying for reasons of conscience or reliIssue 1, 2016 Dialogue 5