discipline summaries
Patient T
Dr. Farazli engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable or
unprofessional conduct in relation to Patient T in her
inappropriate and unprofessional communications with
the patient; in proceeding with a procedure when the
patient was in obvious distress from insufficient sedation; and in exposing the patient to potential infection.
The patient underwent a colonoscopy and was caused
excruciating pain by the procedure.
Undertaking
Dr. Farazli suffers from debilitating medical conditions
that have contributed to her inability to practise medicine. She has not performed procedures since early June
2011 and has not engaged in the practice of medicine
in any way since approximately mid-2012.
Dr. Farazli executed an undertaking never to engage
in the practice of medicine again.
Reasons for Penalty
It was clear to the Committee that Dr. Farazli displayed
a blatant disregard for her patients’ care and safety.
Patients in the very vulnerable position of having a
colonoscopy or gastroscopy were treated in an abusive
and insensitive manner. Her patients were put at risk of
acquiring Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or HIV through Dr.
Farazli’s unconscionable disregard for infection control.
All 20 of the complaints investigations resulted in
findings by the Committee of disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct with additional findings
of misconduct or incompetence in some cases.
Dr. Farazli engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable or
unprofessional conduct in her communication and
interactions with patients. She performed procedures in
a rough and callous manner without providing appropriate analgesia. She also communicated with patients
in an abusive manner. Two patients were charged for
medications which were not administered.
Dr. Farazli contravened regulations under the Medicine Act, 1991 by failing to maintain adequate records
regarding one patient.
Dr. Farazli failed to maintain the standard of practice
of the profession in relation to several complainants
including by attempting to have a sales agent assist her
in one patient’s medical procedure, in relation to another patient by failing to pursue further investigation
within a reasonable time given the patient’s advanced
lesion, and in her documentation regarding one patient.
62
Dialogue Issue 2, 2015
In respect of the section 75 investigation regarding five
patients, she failed to maintain the standard of practice
in not offering patients and referring physicians reasonable options for management.
Dr. Farazli failed to maintain the standard of care
and demonstrated incompetence in not providing
adequate analgesia to Patient J during a colonoscopy,
and displayed incompetence in not aborting Patient Q’s
gastroscopy and failing to offer alternative investigations
or the attempting of the procedure with the assistance
of an anesthetist.
Regarding her facility, Dr. Farazli failed to adhere to
basic infection control practices. She failed to maintain the standard of care on multiple fronts (infection
control, reprocessing, training and certification of staff,
adequate facility maintenance and emergency preparedness) and thereby demonstrated incompetence.
Through her failures, she exposed thousands of patients
to potential infection, causing significant emotional
distress to these patients and a large cost to society for
investigations that were subseq Y[