Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 2 2015 | Page 23

Sexual abuse initiative Council directed that the College seek changes to the Code to incorporate a specific elevated threshold for the production and disclosure of confidential records in College discipline proceedings RHPA Provisions against sexual misconduct while allowing the Amend Code to require colleges to file periDiscipline Committee the flexibility to specify odic reports with the Minister of Health on a period of time shorter than five years for an apsexual abuse plication after a finding of sexual misconduct seen to In order to demonstrate our ongoing commitment to be less serious. ensuring best practices with respect to issues related to sexual abuse, Council has directed that the ColAmend Code to increase threshold and guarlege ask for amendments to the Code requiring all antee standing for patient/complainant on regulated health colleges to report to the Minister on motions for disclosure of victim’s confidential a periodic basis on certain specified questions related records (“third party records motions”) to sexual abuse. One of the most invasive aspects of a discipline hearing It is expected that the College would also post such for complainants is the ability of the physician to access reports publicly. This would help ensure transparency and then reveal publicly at a hearing details of their and consistency on an important issue for the pubprivate medical records, which can include psychiatric lic and the College. It could also help drive process records, records of therapy sessions, and other records improvements in the future and help demonstrate that with extremely confidential information. There is case the College is maintaining its focus on this key area of law setting out the circumstances in which the physiits mandate. cian is entitled to such records; however, the current application of the legal test results in frequent disclosure Give College greater discretion to provide inforof arguably irrelevant records of a highly sensitive and mation to police personal nature. Under s. 36 of the Regulated Health Professions Act, Council directed that the College seek changes to the College can only provide information to police the Code to incorporate a specific elevated threshold about members. Council directed that the College for the production and disclosure of confidential reseek an amendment that would allow us to provide cords in College discipline proceedings, and to require information to the police about persons other than that a patient/complainant whose records are the doctors where that would be in the public interest. subject of such a motion automatically be granted full standing on the motion, if requested. Expand circumstances in which victims have clear right to file victim impact statements Council directed that the College ask the government to extend the requirement for a panel to consider a “victim impact statement” for sexual impropriety in addition to sexual abuse. We believe this will improve the hearing process and experience for victims of sexual abuse. Work in Progress: Work related to the review and analysis of opportunities for legislative change will continue over the coming months. The issues that Council will consider going forward include the following: whether to seek to include in legislation specified criteria for reinstatement applications; and legislative amendments to the funding for therapy and counselling program administered by the Patient Relations Committee. Issue 2, 2015 Dialogue 23