Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 1 2015 | Page 42

practice partner Document discussions about side effects, material risk QA Tips Y ou decide to prescribe a different drug to your patient. You discuss with the patient the potential side effects of taking this new prescription. The patient says that he appreciates the risks, and agrees to try out the new medication. An explanation of potential side effects and material risks is an important discussion to have because a patient’s consent is not valid unless it is informed. So given the significance of the discussion, why then do so many physicians not document the fact of this conversation in their clinical notes? “The lack of In reviewing the results from peer documentation assessments, the College’s Quality Assurance (QA) Committee says it is is a recurring concerned by the significant number of theme in peer physicians who do not document the assessments” discussions about potential side effects of medications in the medical record. “The lack of documentation is a recurring theme in peer assessments. We stress in our decision letters to the physician that although they may have discussed the potential risks and side effects with the patient, they must also make a notation of such discussions. Medical records are the only objective evidence that discussions with patients did, in fact, take place,” said Dr. Bill McCready, Co-chair of the 42 QA Committee, and a clinical nephrologist from Thunder Bay. Ensuring disclosure of any drug side effects or material risks and then documenting the disclosure will promote a patient’s trust in his or her practitioner and reduce chances of a successful patient complaint. In Canada, physicians have been taken to court by patients who claimed they were not adequately informed of side effects or material risks. And in a number of these cases, the courts have sided with the patients when the physicians were unable to provide documentation that demonstrated the patients were indeed informed of any potential side effects of the therapy. Clinical notes, said Dr. McCready, who is also a Council member, must capture all relevant information from a patient encounter. One of the most widely recommended methods for documenting a patient encounter is the Subjective Objective Assessment Plan (SOAP) format. It can also be easily adapted to gather and document information obtained during other specific types of encounters such as psychotherapy. While the College recommends that physicians use the SOAP format, other documentation methods are acceptable as long as they capture all of the elements of SOAP. photo: istockphoto.com Important tip for providing better care to patients Dialogue Issue 1, 2015 Issue1_15.indd 42 2015-03-19 11:18 AM