TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE
Given that context, below is a
tentative list of the categories of
information in Phase 2:
1. riminal charges (if relevant to
C
practice)
Sidebar 2
Information that health-care regulators do not
recommend be made public:
1. wards/academic appointments
A
10. Mandatory reports (fact of )
2. icences held in other jurisdicL
tions (if known)
2. Practice focus
11. Complaint (fact of )
3. Refused licences
12. Complaint (status)
3. iscipline findings in other
D
jurisdictions (if known)
4. Exam results
13. Resolutions
4. iscipline Committee –
D
No findings
5. ho has been selected for QA
W
14. ICRC: No Action
6. QA results
15. ICRC: Other Action
7. Settlements (civil)
16. erms, Conditions & LimitaT
tions (historical)
5. Undertakings
8. egistrar’s Investigation (fact of)
R
6. CRC: Oral Cautions
I
7. CRC: Specified Continuing
I
Education and Remediation
Program (SCERPs)
Council noted that making public
some of these categories of information – in particular, undertakings, oral cautions and CPSO-
9. egistrar’s Investigation
R
(status/other information)
ordered education for significant
concerns – would be a significant
departure from the College’s current approach. As such, an extensive discussion will be held with the
17. ncapacity matters (pre-referral)
I
public and the profession before
any decision is made about which
categories of information, if any,
will be made public.
At this point, AGRE believes that
Principle 5:
Principle 6:
Principle 7:
Principle 8:
Certain regulatory pro-
Transparency discussions
The greater the poten-
Information available
cesses intended to im-
should balance the prin-
tial risk to the public, the
from Colleges about
prove competence may
ciples of public protection
more important trans-
members and processes
lead to better outcomes
and accountability, with
parency becomes.
should be similar.
for the public if they
fairness and privacy.
happen confidentially.
DIALOGUE • Issue 2, 2014
21