Designing the Classroom Curriculum Designing the Classroom Curriculum | Page 33
Lynch, Smith, Howarth
•
•
•
•
•
skills and often reflecting some of the concepts identified in the national documents available when
the frameworks were developed in the individual states. (Typically “content” reflects perceived self-
sufficiency needs, significance, utility, student interests and so on).
Pedagogy and teacher practices in combination with presentation of subject content. (This is usually
schematic rather than detailed).
Equity linkages (such as opportunity-to-learn objectives or standards).
Policy linkages (a comprehensive approach to the relationships of content to student assessment,
professional development, teacher preparation and certification, support services, school
governance, facilities, community involvement, and other areas of policy).
Performance expectations/standards and recommendations for the use of alternative forms of
assessment.
Rationale for the use of technology and tools in the classroom (cited in North Central Regional
Educational Laboratory, n.d.)
Curriculum Development
‘Curriculum development’ deals with the total plan and rationale that shapes the classroom
curriculum when the teacher begins thinking about what they will do as a teacher in a classroom. At this
stage, such elements as the “content”, objectives and outcomes, lessons and assessment take on special
significance. Curriculum development draws on preferred sources to create the classroom curriculum
including the individual student’s characteristics, discipline and other knowledge, society and its institutions
and science, depending on the designer’s brief or conceptions. An on-going criticism of curriculum
development models is that the bits that comprise them are often poorly defined, or lack theoretical
underpinnings. For example, the term “learning experiences” is commonly used but is not so commonly
linked to the teaching activities that provide the opportunities for students to experience them.
Curriculum Design
‘Curriculum design’ is what teachers do as they plan their classroom curriculum. There are two
main approaches. The first relies on the characteristics of people and the second is more interventionist,
seeking to guide students through experiences that are thought to be necessary for the individual and society
and that can be evaluated.
The first kind of curriculum design premise stresses subjective aspects of human life, the personal and
aesthetic, the uniqueness and importance of the individual( 9 ). The focus tends to be squarely on
communication, personal values, the individual's self-perceptions, self-expression, self-needs and personality
integration. Also, in keeping with this approach, it tends to favour activity, group-oriented and “learning
( 9 ) See for example http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/humanist.htm
33