Current Pedorthics | July-August 2018 | Vol.50, Issue 4 | Page 31

FOOTWEAR CHOICES FOR PAINFUL FEET worn to clinic and presenting symptoms were assessed with a Chi-square for independence. 5) Activity (trainers and walking shoes) 6) T-bars Foot pathology was itemized as bone deformity (hallux adbucto valgus [HAV], hammer and claw digits), skin pathology (hyperkeratotic lesions, fissures and blisters) and soft tissue (musculoskeletal pathology, neuroma and plantar heel pain.) Differences for footwear 40-59 (N 32) 61 + (N 35) P VALUE GROUP A GROUP B A VS B Slip - on 5 14* 0.047* Formal 3 1 0.261 Open toed 9 9 0.824 Boots 3 1 0.261 Acitivity 10 7 0.29 T-Bar 2 3 0.718 HAV 12 23* 0.021* Hammer 13 9 0.194 Claw 2 7 0.099 Callus 29* 25 0.047* Corn 19 27* 0.013* Blister 1 0 0.292 Neuroma 2 1 0.502 Heel Pain 1 1 0.949 TABLE 2 FOOTWEAR CATEGORY Bone deformity PRESENTING SYMPTOM Footwear choice data collected used a mix of continuous and categorical variables and was statistically analyzed, using Cochrane’s Q test for footwear purchase choice and Kruskal-Wallis test for emotions. All data was analyzed using the SPSS V24 (IBM) and set at 95%confidence (p > 0.05). Skin Pathology Soft Tissue *p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant difference between group A and B Current Pedorthics | July/August 2018 29