Creating Profit Through Alliances - business models for collaboration E-book | Page 78

brand reputation. The collaboration may also be restricted to a small number of highly exclusive products, for instance a Ferrari car with Louis Vutton upholstery. Third, parties can arrange a settlement for their marketing efforts. If the producing brand advertises the product, the added brand enjoys the benefit of a greater name recognition. In that case the costs of the campaign can be shared. A combination of arrangements may mean that the added brand ends up making a net contribution. This could be justified if its brand value is inferior to that of the producing brand, in combination with the right to supply its own product as an ingredient at a favourable price. This may well have been the case in the collaboration between Dr. Pepper cola with NutraSweet sweetener. The modularity of the product also affects the coordination costs and the risks of research and development. This applies particularly during the exploratory phase, during which the product concept is selected based on a large number of ideas and options. In the commercialisation phase, the product is more or less determined, but then it's a matter of choosing marketing approaches. Here parties often rely on a Stage-Gate model, as described by Cooper. This means that parties must decide in each stage which concepts to pursue, and whether they wish to continue investing. New insights derived from the innovation process can result in changing attitudes towards the alliance, however. This may prompt new arrangements about the income and cost distribution, or even to a different alliance structure32. Joint R&D The possible variations in contract design pertain both to cost distribution and revenue distribution, as well as the period for which the parties accept obligations. In making arrangements for joint research and development, an important consideration is the extent to which the parties aim to generate shared revenue. It could be that the parties work to produce a single new product and arrange a particular distribution of the revenue, as General Motors and Mercedes Benz have done in the development of a hybrid automobile. As regards cost distribution, in many development collaborations the parties will arrange to each bear their own development costs; certainly if both parties largely have their own income. Where the parties work to develop a single product, it will generally be more obvious to define a development budget and arrange cost sharing accordingly. This cost distribution will often be coupled to the revenue distribution. A second scenario is that the parties work to produce complementary products, as did Heineken and Krupps with the Beertender, for which Heineken sells the beer kegs and Krupps sells the home tap. Finally, the parties may engage in joint research but then develop and market their own product, perhaps even in competition with each other. The period may encompass the entire development process, or it may involve just one or two development stages. In the latter case, the contract may contain a provision that if one of the parties decides to pull out, that party will be liable to pay a penalty as compensation for the possibly wasted efforts of the other partner. 76