CPD Specifier May 2015 issue May 2014 | Page 25

Roofs Fakro roof windows set new design standards Roof windows are now being used as an intrinsic element of interior design, even in Passivhaus and EnerPhit homes. This might seem impractical given the trend for using windows in combination as the minimum Passivhaus requirement is for triple-glazed windows with a U-value of 0.85W/m2K. In terms of building airtightness too, the requirement is similarly stringent, with 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (positive and negative pressure) being needed. The demand for improved roof window performance has, therefore, prompted products of increasing sophistication. For some manufacturers, achieving the standard for passive construction is unachievable using standard products. FAKRO, by contrast offers a choice of either triple or quadruple-glazed products, the quadruple glazed FTT U8 Thermo providing an installed value of 0.58W/m2K and the FTT U6 0.81. These products are matched by the recently launched range of stylish flat roof windows which have truly raised the bar, particularly for those specifying green roofs. In terms of airtightness, site tests for EnerPhit certification revealed no detachable air flow through the seals of the FTT U8. Despite such demands on roof window performance, the gap in performance between manufacturers is growing with some, for example, quoting U-values for the glazing unit rather than for the installed window. Improved performance is, however, far from easy to achieve as it relies on a number of factors. Most are not immediately obvious. The seals that Fakro uses are of thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) which retains its elasticity and has a proven track record in the medical, industrial and automotive sectors. The suggestion that roof windows might provide an easy point of entry for burglars was, until recently, considered almost fanciful. It would certainly not have prompted specification of particular performance criteria but the trend towards multi-occupancy FAKRO GB buildings brought with it easier access to the roof. Intruders found that the roof window sash invariably presented an easy target as, under light foot pressure many can be forced without breaking the glass. It is perhaps not surprising that some have been so slow to acknowledge this problem but the absence of a Standard by which to measure safety and security didn’t help. While EN13049 put that right, there is still a marked absence of performance data from some manufacturers. By contrast, Fakro’s topSafe® system of hinge and lock reinforcement took a completely fresh design approach and provided a benchmark for performance. All of the company’s products meet a minimum Class 3, the system not only preventing the sash from being forced and the timber from being split but enabling the window to withstand the weight of an individual jumping on the glass. The concept of a roof window’s hardware having an impact on the visual aesthetic might also seem unusual. However, by positioning the vent in the top of the frame, Fakro was able to pioneer the approach in which the operating handle was placed in the base of the sash. Not only has this lent greater practicality to window usage it enabled the window to be installed higher in the roof. Frames also have a sleeker, more contemporary style. Electronically operated windows equipped with ‘Z-Wave’ are a new development, Z-Wave utilises a wireless protocol for communication between appliances, enabling a range of devices to be operated from a single remote - lighting, alarm, computer, air conditioning and blinds to name just a few. Z-Wave has been adopted by over 200 leading manufacturers including Apple, Intel, Panasonic and Danfoss. TEL: 01283 554755 WWW.FAKRO.CO.UK As a consequence of the increasing demand for high performance, many architects now specify particular aspects of performance. This may involve features as diverse as windows being fixed closed, for example above a covered walkway, or acoustic value. In many respects this offers the ultimate test of quality - does the manufacturer encourage the architect to specify performance or does it suggest that other facets of the building design should be used to offset the poorer performance of the roof window? This is certainly a question we can expect to be asked more and more. READER ENQUIRY NO: 35 25 Page 25.indd 1 10/04/2014 10:50:23