CPABC in Focus - May/June 2015 | Page 33

fessional Conduct – Independence (paragraph 192, “Fees – Overdue”).2 Accordingly, CPAB proposed that the Firm take the following steps: a)  easing to perform audits of any C reporting issuers that have unpaid audit fees from prior years. b)  ppointing an individual with A appropriate experience to serve as an independence monitor. This person would have to ensure that the Firm stays up to date with independence requirements and adheres to any independence-related policies. These policies and requirements would include, but would not be limited to: partner rotation policies; annual independence confirmations; and ensuring that audits weren’t performed until all fees for prior years had been paid. c)  aintaining these requirements until M CPAB has carried out a follow-up inspection and concluded that its audit quality has improved sufficiently. The Firm agreed to CPAB’s proposed requirements and reported the matter to both the ICABC and the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC). It also informed all clients with unpaid fees about the new practice restrictions. The PCEC subsequently authorized an investigation into the matter.  ule 204 and the related Council R 2 Interpretations (CIs) were amended to take effect on December 15, 2014, to reflect the revised harmonized rules on independence. For the purpose of this article, the amended Rule and CI numbers have been used to enable a current reference point for readers. The substance of the previous Rule and CI did not change in the amended versions. Please refer to the June/Summer Firm e