CPABC in Focus July/August 2018 | Page 40

Holding Passive Investments in a Private Corporation — Impact on the Small Business Deduction By Maninder Dhadda, CPA, CGA Maninder Dhadda is a senior tax manager at Smythe LLP in Vancouver. He specializes in Canadian taxation and primarily focuses on advising the shareholders of privately owned companies with regard to their Canadian corporate and personal income tax planning and compliance matters. Maninder would like to thank Tom Morton, CPA, CA, a tax partner at Smythe LLP, for his advice and guidance on this article. Note to readers: The consultation paper described in this article generated considerable concern among many in the profession in the summer and fall of 2017. To review CPA Canada’s response to the proposed legislation, visit the Members’ Area of the cpacanada.ca website and choose “Taxation of private corporations” under News from the profession. As of this writing, the latest update was made on May 16, 2018. O n July 18, 2017, Canada’s Department of Finance released a consultation document about the use of tax-planning strategies involving private corporations. The government’s stated intention in releasing the document was to increase the fairness of the tax s ystem, which is foundational to the Income Tax Act (ITA). At issue was the perception that private company owners can accumu- late investment wealth faster than employees earning the equivalent income—specifically, that private companies taxed at lower tax rates than individuals can use these tax savings to accumulate passive investments rather than reinvesting the after-tax earnings in their business to stimulate growth, create more employment, etc. The consultation document proposed three possible solutions to this perceived inequity, which amounted to three very complex—some would say unworkable—proposals to levy additional income taxes on any pas- sive investment income earned by private companies. Several months of consultation followed. Then came the release of the February 27, 2018, Federal Budget and accompanying Notice of Ways and Means Motion, which included substantive tax changes to reduce the perceived advantage to private corporations holding passive investments. The proposed new tax rules differ from those in the July 2017 consul- tation document in that they do not directly levy additional income taxes; instead, the government proposed changes to the ITA that would limit deferral advantages to private corporations “in a more targeted and simpler manner.” 1 The proposed new rules Under the legislation proposed on February 27, 2018 (the proposed legislation), 2 a corporation and its “associated corporations” 3 that earn more than $50,000 of passive investment in- come in a year will find their access to the small business deduction (SBD) 4 reduced. To understand the mechanics of how passive investment income grinds down the SBD, a brief refresher of the SBD rules may be helpful. At its simplest, the SBD is a credit against in- come taxes otherwise payable by a Canadian- controlled private corporation (CCPC) 5 that reduces the combined federal and BC corpo- rate income tax rates from 27% to 12% (2018 rates) on the first $500,000 6 of the CCPC’s income from “active business” 7 carried on in Canada. The $500,000 SBD business limit is shared among associated corporations. Under the existing legislation, the $500,000 SBD business limit for a particular taxation year is reduced if the CCPC or associated CCPCs’ “taxable capital employed in Canada” 8 in the preceding taxation year exceeds $10 mil- lion. If the taxable capital employed in Canada in the preceding taxation year reaches $15 million, the limit is ground to $0. 9 1 Department of Finance Canada, Equality + Growth: A Strong Middle Class (Budget Plan), 2018 (page 73). 2 The proposed legislation, Bill C-74, had its first reading on March 27, 2018. 3 ITA, Part XVII, Subsection 256 (1). 4 ITA, Subdivision B, Subsection 125 (1). 5 ITA, Subdivision B, Subsection 125 (7). 6 A CCPC’s business limit for a taxation year is $500,000. The $500,000 business limit is shared among associated 7 ITA, Subdivision B, Subsection 125 (7). 8 ITA, Part I.3, Section 181.2. 9 ITA, Subdivision B, Subsection 125 (5.1). CCPCs, pursuant to Subdivision B, Subsection 125 (2) of the ITA. 40 CPABC in Focus • July/August 2018