Coop Politiche Sociali - Coop e Scuola In bocca al lupo | Page 111

LA PUBBLICITÀ E I COMPORTAMENTI ALIMENTARI DEI RAGAZZI

relations, in “European Monographs in Social Psychology”, 14, Londra, Academic Press. Tajfel FI. (1981), Human Groups and Sedal Categories. Studies in soda! psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, trad. il. Gruppi umani e categorie sociali, Il Mulino, Bologna. Tajfei 11. (a cura di) (1982), Social identity and intergroup relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Tajfel H. e Forgas J. P. (1981), Social categorisation: cognitions, values and groups, in Forgas, J.P., (a cura di), Sodal cognitions, Academic Press, Londra. Tani E (1994), “La stabilità nel tempo dei legami tra aggressività e caratteristiche di personalità”, Età evolutiva: rivista di scienze dello sviluppo, 48: 96-100. Tapscott D. (1998), Growing up digital: the rise of the Net generation, Mc Graw Hill, New York. Taylor S. E. e Crocker J. (1981), “Schematic basis of social information processing”, Soda! cognition, the Ontario symposiun on personality and socialpsvchology, Lawrence Erlbautn, New Jersey. Tiggenaann M., Gardiner M. e Slater A. (2000), “1 wouid ratber be a size 10 than have straight A’s”, Journal of adolescence, 23; 645-659. Tonolo 0. (1999), Adolescenza e identità, Il Mulino, Bologna. Trehub 8. E. e Rabinovitch 5. (1972), “Auditory-Linguistic sensitivity in early infancy”, Developmental psychology, 6: 74-77. Treisman A. (1969), “Strategies and models of selective attention”, Psychology review, 72: 282 — 299. Turner J. C. (1975), “Sodal comparison and social identity: some prospect for intergroup behaviour”, European journal of socialpsychology, 5: 5-34. Tumer J. C. (1982), Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group, in Tajfel H. (a cura di), Social identity and intergroup relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Van Evra 3. (1998), Television and child development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, N.J. Vaugh N. e Norman D. (1965), “Primary Memory”, Psychological review, 72:89- 104. Vaughn B. E. e Waters E. (1981), “Attention structure, socioinetric status and dominance: interelations, behavioural correlates and relationship to social competence”, Developmental psychology, 17: 275-288. Verhaercn 3. (1991), Kinderen en Televisiereìclame; Een Onderzoek naar de (wan)orde in Rehuleringen met betrekking tot Kinderen, Aanzet tot een bruikbaar Model voor Vlaaderen?, Licentiaatsverhandeling, Bruxelles. Vema M. E. (1975), “The female image in children’s TV commercials”, Journal of broadcasting, 19: 301-309. Vemon P. A. (1987), New developments in renetion time research, in Vernon, PA. Speed of information processing and intelligence, Ablex, Norwood, New York. Vernon, PA. (1987), Speed of information processing and intelligence, Ablex, Norwood, New York. Vestergaard EI’. e Schròder K. (1985), The language of advertising, Blackwell, Oxford. Volpato G. (1986), Concorrenza, impresa, strategie, Il Mulino, Bologna. Ward 5. e Wackman D. (1973), Chiildren s’ information processing of television advertising, in Clark P., New models for mass communication res earch, Sage, Beverly Hills. Wartella E. (1980), Children and television: the development of the child’s understanding of the medium, Sage Publication, Thousands Oaks. Waters E., Vaughn B. e Egeland B. (1980), “Individual differences in infantmother attachment. Relationship at age one: antecedent in neonatal behaviour in an urban, economically disadvantaged sample”, Child development, 51: 203-216. Watkins B. (1988), “Children’s representations of television ami real life stories”, Communication research, 15: 159-184. Waugh N. C. e Norman D. A. (1965), “Primary memory”, Psychological review, 72: 89-104. Welch R. L., Huston-Stein A., Wright J. C. e Plehal R. (1979), “Subtle sexrole cues in children’s commercials”, Journal of communication, 29: 202- 209. Wernick A. (1991), Promotional culture: advertising, ideology and symbolic expression, Sage, Londra. Williamson J. (1985), Decoding advertisements, Marion Boyars, Londra. Winn W. (1989), “Pictures as distractors in reading”, Journal of educational psychology, 70: 255-262.
111