Comstock's magazine 0519 - May 2019 - Page 19

be a waste of your time and their time. If you feel compelled to give a why an- swer to people who didn’t qualify for an interview but want a reason, the answer should always be: “We had numerous applicants for the position, and couldn’t interview everyone. Thanks so much for your application. We will keep it on file for 12 months.” Don’t include, “We will consider you if a position comes up that meets your qualifications,” because the same people who want to know the reason they didn’t get interviewed will monitor your job postings and demand to know why you didn’t contact them for certain positions. However, for candidates who did reach the interview stage, the obligation is a bit higher. Legally, you still have no obligation to say anything. Ethically, though, you should send a “no thanks” email. This is good business practice, because you might not want to hire the candidate today, but you might want to hire her tomorrow. Remember, hiring managers can burn bridges as well. But keep in mind that every time you give feedback, you run the risk of getting into an argument with the candidate — she’ll have a response for every point you make. “We went with someone with more experience,” you say. She counters: “But the job posting says five years of service and I have seven!” You say, “We hired a candidate who was strong in X,” and she responds, “I have six years of X!” You’re not going to change her mind, so this discussion is pointless. You’ll have to end the conversation by saying, “That’s all the feedback we have. Have a nice day.” Sometimes it’s a kind gesture to offer feedback, but make sure it is objective and concerns only fixable things. For example, telling a candidate he wasn’t a good cultural fit is not generally fixable. Cultures vary from company to compa- ny and even department to department. This person may not need to change; they may just need a different job. Be careful what you say, because it could get you into legal trouble. If you tell a candidate your company went with someone who didn’t come across “quite so bossy,” this is problematic, as “bossy” is usually a sexist term applied to women. If you hired an assertive male instead, you may have to defend your statement in court. Or what if you tell a candidate you wanted someone to add diversity to the department? Does that mean you based your decision on skin color? Yikes. Illegal. But saying the company decided to go with someone with more public speaking experience refers to something fixable and clear. Yes, it opens you up to arguments, but you can easily defend your statement. Or if you tell someone they were a strong candidate, but you ultimately hired someone with a Ph.D. in mathematics rather than a master’s degree, that is again clear and fixable (though not very quickly for the candi- date!). If you ultimately decided not to hire someone or changed the job description so this person was no longer qualified, then that’s an easy answer. Just be hon- est. However, if you rejected everyone and are going for round two, avoid any direct feedback. You don’t want to say “we didn’t hire you because of X” only to change your mind two months later and hire someone without X. So, no, you don’t need to give a rea- son for not selecting an applicant, but if you do, make it short, not subjective and clear. When in doubt, it’s probably best to stick with: “We had many qualified candidates, and we do appreciate your time.” n Suzanne Lucas spent 10 years in corporate human resources, where she hired, fired, managed the numbers and double- checked with the lawyers. On Twitter @RealEvilHRLady. Send questions to How do you handle inquiries from rejected job candidates? TWEET US @COMSTOCKSMAG May 2019 | 19