--classstrugggle-flipmag CS Oct-2018 MKP | Page 18

Political and Economic Notes: Army Personnel Attempts to Defeat Justice and Righteous Aspirations of Citizens In 1980 the central govern- ment had imposed the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act.1958 (AFSPA) in Manipur in the name of countering insurgency. Subse- quently the AFSPA has been imposed in other north-eastern states besides in Jammu&Kashmir state under some pretext or other. With that the army personnel and other para-military forces engaged in those states in their “policing” roles have been playing havoc with the lives of common innocent citizens in the way of fake encounter killings, maiming, rape, plunder and loot, under the protection of AFSPA with impurity. The people of those states have been continuously protesting the outrages committed by the army personnel playing havoc with their lives property and dignity and have been demanding to punish the concerned army personnel that have been committing such ghastly crimes against common innocent people. They have been also demanding for the revocation the AFSPA in their states and to safeguard them from the ravages of the military personnel. But the rulers of the central government have been keeping a deaf ear to the righteous demands of the affected people to revocate the AFSPA, particularly on the argument and pretext that the military institution is not agreeing to revoke the AFSPA in the interests of sovereignty, security and integrity of our country. Many officers of the highest echelon of the military as well the Lt.governers of those states have 18 been voicing and trumpeting the same reasons about the inadvisability of revoking the AFSPA that has become the hanging rope for the people of those states in their practical levels. From 1979 to 2012 in Manipur state alone 1, 528 cases of extra judicial killings (fake encounters) have occurred besides many citizens were maimed, raped and abducted without a trace. Neither the state nor the concerned military personnel were made responsible for these crimes and no one was punished under the protection of AFSPA. Not even attempts were made to find out the culprits even under the military law and to punish them. During the course of time the military personnel who are supposed to be working with the commitment of “safe guarding all citizens irrespective of religion, caste, sex, region” have developed a perception that AFSPA is a privilege for them for doing the job of countering internal disturbances and insurgencies. They even took it as a privilege to the extent of unmitigated right to “plunder, kill and loot” as they please in these areas. They even perceive that they should be placed the law and justice of the land. On the other hand, the citizens being the victims to the untold brutalities of the military personnel in those states are agitating with protests opposing the AFSPA demanding its revocation and punishments to those military personnel that committed the outrages. They are righteous aspiring for the withdrawal of AFSPA totally. A public interest litigation was filed in the Supreme Court seeking a probe in to as many as 1528 cases of extra judicial killings that took place in Manipur. The Supreme Court rightly responded to this PIL formed a committee with 3 eminent personalities in public life-Retired Supreme court justice, Santosh Hegde former chief election commissioner, J.M.Lingdo and ex-DGP Ajay Kumar Singh-to examine into the allegations and submit a report on the petition. The committee which examines the petition in depth concluded that all those encounters were fake and extra judicial killings. Then the Supreme Court intended to conduct an enquiry in to all those incidents of encounters. But the then Attorney General on behalf of the government had argued that there was no necessity to enquire in to those encounters, since there was a ‘war situations’ in that state and that the military was empowered with extraordinary powers with AFSPA. But the Supreme Court not agreeing with the contention of the government had constituted in Special Investigation Team under the CBI and ordered the framing of charge sheets in a time bound manner against Army and Police officers involved in the encounters. Accordingly the SIT had filed charge-sheets in connection with fake encounters by the Army, Assam Rifles and police in Manipur. Class Struggle