--classstrugggle-flipmag classstruggle-nov-2017-flippbook | Page 7

daily addressed by the Bolsheviks. During this strike, the workers had set up a Council of the Representatives. They were, in reality, one of the first Soviets of Workers Deputies in Russia. The peasants’ unrest broke out in the spring. The peasants’ enmasse raided the estates, sugar- refineries and distilleries of the landlords. They had set fire to their Palaces and Manors. In many areas, the peasants had seized the lands, resorted to the whole sale cutting down of forests. They demanded to turn the landed estates over to the people. They seized the granaries and other products of landlords and distributed them among the starving. The landlords fled to the towns in panic. The tsarist govt. had deployed the armed forces heavily in the villages and sought to crush the peasant revolt. The firings, arrests of the “ring leaders”, floggings and torturing went on unabated. But the peasants did not cease their struggle. The peasant movement had spread widely in the central parts of Russia, Volga region and in Georgia. The Bolsheviks were fully active in the Country side. But the 1905 Uprising faced a defeat. Utilising all the weaknesses in the movement, the tsarist govt. had succeeded in crushing down the upsurge. The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks seriously differed on the appraisal of this defeat. The Mensheviks were overwhelmed by the tendency of defeatism. They repented and declared that the workers should not have taken to arms. A peaceful method of struggle should have been adopted. But Lenin had emphatically asserted: “On the contrary, we should have been more resolute, energetic and aggressive in our armed struggle and prepare the people for it”. Lenin had drawn most valuable lessons from the 1905 Revolution. He said: i) The 1905 revolution had “deeply ploughed the soil, uprooted the age - old prejudices, awakened millions of workers, tens of millions of peasants to political life and political struggle and revealed to each other – and to the world – all classes (all the principal parties) of Russian Society in their true character and in the true alignment of their interests, their forces, their modes of action, and their immediate and ultimate aims”; ii) “Without the dress rehearsal of 1905, the victory of October Revolution was not possible”; iii) The peasantry was still harbouring bourgeois illusions. Neither a stable worker – peasant alliance was forged nor was the hegemony of the Proletariat established over the revolution. As a result, a concerted and decisive blow could not be inflicted on the feudal classes and the tsarist autocracy; iv) The 1905 revolution had taught that “ ‘no sympathy’ for the workers on the part of the educated people, no struggle of lone terrorists, however heroic, could do anything to undermine the November - 2017 tsarist autocracy and the omnipotence of the capitalists. This could be achieved only by the struggle of the workers themselves, only by the combined struggle of the millions......” W ith the suppression of 1905 upsurge, the revolutionary tide began to recede and gradually subside. However, the tsarist govt. knew that it had suppressed an upsurge but the revolution still haunts it. So in addition to repression it resorted to another ‘soft’ weapon. It proclaimed a law in Dec 1905 convening a ‘legislative’ duma. This Duma, however, had denied voting rights to over half of the population (women and mill workers), provided for an unequal and cumbersome electoral process to ensure that the Duma remains dominated by the classes that are subservient to the tsar and acts like a rubber stamp. The Mensheviks, however, extolled it as a means to solve the problems of revolution and liberate the people from the tsardom. The Bolsheviks saw the Duma as “an impotent appendage of tsardom, a screen for the evils of tsardom, which later would be discarded as soon as it proved inconvenient”. The Bolsheviks had boycotted the elections for the (Witte) Duma of 1906. But later they concluded that it was “a mistake, although a small and easily remediable,” as this Duma had come in the immediate after – math of the defeat of 1905 revolution. Then, the party was in dire need of utilising every forum and legal opportunity to revive the revolutionary move- ment. The Bolsheviks knew that large sections of 7