Civil Affairs Issue Papers Volume 1, 2014-2015 Civil Affairs Issue Papers | Page 61

Teams would internally track their ARFORGEN requirements for key members, allowing considerations for new Soldiers, those awaiting MOS reclassification, pending losses, and those with temporary medical issues, and push for their completion at the lowest level.5 Unit-level Mission Essential Task List (METL) training can then be more specifically targeted and verified by battalion or higher leadership, so as to bring these teams up to ARFORGEN standards quickly and effectively, resulting in organic elements that have trained together, with members that are fully aware of, and invested in, their team’s capabilities. While team-based validation would help to ensure that missions are assigned to teams that are judged to be fully capable by ARFORGEN standards, the lessons from recent operations clearly show that simply providing the proper number of “ready” bodies to a theater is not always sufficient to ensure success. In an effort to address a lack in specialized skill sets, the CA Proponent has further developed its Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) system. This has partly addressed the branch’s inability to expand and organize the civilian skill sets of its Soldiers along CA functional specialties, such as Public Health, Governance and Rule of Law. Additionally, a long term plan to provide a separate career path for Civil Affairs officers, known as the 38G path, is also in development with the goal of further enhancing CA’s ability to support its specialized mission requirements.6 These efforts would be a good start if the 38G program were even fully supported for implementation, but it has languished for several years now. Even if implemented as envisioned in late 2015, it partly ignores the aforementioned issue that CA missions often require a specific skill set for a specific mission. 42