Civil Affairs Issue Papers Volume 1, 2014-2015 Civil Affairs Issue Papers | Page 29

After its considerable use in the campaigns of 1991, Civil Affairs became a valued function for theater staff. Peacekeeping operations used CA extensively, and frequent call-ups led to consideration of expanding Active Component (AC) capabilities, as Reserve Component (RC) CA capacity increasingly required reconstitution. By the time the first rotation of Operation Iraqi Freedom was over, more than half of the qualified and available Reserve Component CA personnel had been exhausted. When Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom became protracted campaigns, DoD reaped the result of the earlier, massive call-up of RC CA units – leading DoD to fill resulting gaps first with RC members of other services, who had neither the institutional support nor the professional ethos of the extant CA force structure, and then expanding the AC CA structure. A 2011 RAND study later found CA the most utilized career field in the Army Reserve. Experimental staffing models such as billet transfers from underused specialties to CA could offer a staffing solution to reduce the ratio of deployment-to-“dwell” time to the DoD goal of one year on active duty in five years of Reserve service. Even then, CA remained the busiest career field in the USAR, with deployment rates far exceeding all other specialties.1 Thus, the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review called for significantly increasing CA, resulting in first the 95th CA Brigade (grown from the 96th CA Battalion serving Special Operations) and later adding the 85thCA Brigade as a General Purpose unit. RC CA increased by about one third, Marine Corps CA capacity more than doubled, and the Navy revived attention to CA. While the operational environment demanded CA for the counterterrorist campaigns of the newcen- 10