Civil Affairs Issue Papers Volume 1, 2014-2015 Civil Affairs Issue Papers | Page 129

ODA is primarily focused on training and fighting alongside a guerrilla or partner nation force, a CA team must focus on individual and team survivability in a low signature environment. Threats faced may include insurgents, terrorists, foreign intelligence services and common criminals. As part of the only U.S. military present in some regions, the ability to blend seamlessly with other SOF teams and form a Crisis Response Element (CRE) or Quick Reaction Force (QRF) when needed, adds value in the eyes of commanders and chiefs of mission. Advanced marksmanship, high threat driving and surveillance detection are all examples of the skills required. Active duty SOF CA conducts this type of training, however the Phase 0 environment includes regionally aligned conventional forces as well. Advanced tactical training should be incorporated into the qualification pipeline for all CA soldiers. The 2006 separation of the U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (USACAPOC) from the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) and the designation of Army Reserve CA as “conventional” has often been blamed for the force structure imbalance. However, the problem existed prior to 2006. At that time there were only four CA battalions in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) with a dedicated SOF mission, these were designated Foreign Internal Defense/Unconventional Warfare (FID/UW) battalions. The majority of USAR CA battalions were designated as General Purpose and configured to support conventional maneuver units. The only active duty unit, the 96th CA battalion, was designated as General Support and intended as an earlyentry SOF CA capability working with both SOF and conventional forces.15 Before 2006, there was already a 110