CardioSource WorldNews | Page 16

CLINICAL NEWS JACC in a FLASH Focus On: Population Health availability when determining AED placement, as well as advocating for government legislation mandating that all AEDs be registered with emergency medical services dispatch centers and accessible to the public 24/7. In an accompanying editorial comment, Robert J. Myerburg, MD, applauds the study and writes that its findings should be taken into account as part of planning strategies for AED locations. However, he also notes that society would benefit from a “parallel effort to develop a roadmap for improving prediction and prevention of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.” JACC Special Issue Dedicated to Cardiovascular Health Promotion JACC recently published a special issue focused solely on cardiovascular health promotion. Studies addressed topics ranging from smoking cessation to the prevention of cardiovascular disease and other related conditions. Check out the full issue at onlinejacc.org. Some study highlights are listed here: Longer Living Parents, Longer Living Children The risks of cardiovascular conditions may be progressively lower the longer a person’s parents lived past 69 years old, according to a study out of the U.K. Researchers examined 186,151 non-adopted participants aged 55-73 years with deceased parents who participated in U.K. Biobank, a voluntary health research database. Follow-up data was collected over 8 years from hospital admissions records and death records. Results showed an inverse relationship between age of parent’s death and the mortality rate of offspring. When the mother and father survived past age 69, allcause mortality of offspring declined 16% and 17%, respectively, per additional decade of the parents’ lives. Coronary heart disease mortality declined by 20% and 21% per additional decade of the parents’ lives. Participants with parents who lived longer also showed lower incidence of peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, stroke, hypertension, 14 CardioSource WorldNews anemia, hypercholesterolemia, and atrial fibrillation. “It’s been unclear why some older people develop heart conditions in their sixties while others only develop these conditions in their nineties or even older,” says David Melzer, MBBCh, PhD, senior author of the study. “Avoiding the well-known risk factors such as smoking is very important, but our research shows there are also factors inherited from parents that influence heart health. As we understand these parental factors better, we should be able to help more people to age well.” Where’s the AED? There’s only a one in five chance that a potentially life-saving automated external defibrillator (AED) will be nearby when someone experiences cardiac arrest, and a 20% to 30% chance that the nearby device will be inaccessible because it is inside a building that’s closed, according to a study out of Toronto. Researchers, led by Timothy C.Y. Chan, PhD, examined all public outof-hospital cardiac arrests occurring between January 2006 and August 2014 in Toronto. Public locations included public buildings, places of recreation, industrial facilities and outdoor public spaces, but not hospitals or nursing homes. Researchers compared that to a list of registered AEDs in Toronto as of March 2015. Results showed that Toronto had 2,440 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the study period and 767 AED locations. Of the AED locations, 542 (73%) were not open 24 hours a day and 211 (28.6%) were closed on weekends. Of the total number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 451 were located near an AED but only 354 were located near an AED when the AED was accessible, resulting in a coverage loss of 21.5%. When researchers looked at cardiac arrests in the evening/overnight hours (between 4 p.m. and 8 p.m.) and over weekends, coverage loss increased to 31.6%. Study authors suggest using a model that accounts for both location and Pay to Quit Smoking Cessation Model? A Swiss study that randomized 805 low-income smokers to an incentive group that received incremental monetary rewards (up to $1,500) for confirmed smoking abstinence or a control group that wasn’t paid, found that those in the incentive group had a higher rate of confirmed abstinence at 3 months, 6 months and 18 months. Results showed that at 3 months, 44.4% of the smokers in the incentive group reported they had been abstinent continuously versus 6.4% of the control group. At 6 months, 35.9% of the incentive group and 5.7% of the control group reported continuous abstinence. At 18 months, which was 1 year after incentive payments ended, 9.5% of the incentive group and 3.7% of the control were confirmed abstinent. The authors conclude that while a large group relapsed after payments ended, abstinence rates a full year after the last incentive were almost six percentage points higher among smokers who received financial incentives compared with those who did not. In an accompanying editorial comment, Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, and Judith J. Prochaska, PhD, MPH, write that incentives may prove useful for engaging unmotivated smokers in quitting. “Future work should aim to bridge critical knowledge gaps concerning incentive design and delivery, and ultimately, inform the comparative effectiveness of financial incentives relative to other clinical and behavioral approaches to treating nicotine addiction,” they said. ■ September 2016