CardioSource WorldNews | Page 33

You might not be feeling all that social towards social media. You may find it a giant waste of time and energy. Also, isn’t it a legal minefield? Why in the world should you be interested in this? “Social media is a tool that we can use to transform health care,” said Kevin R. Campbell, MD (@DrKevinCampbell; 29.5K Tweets, 99.4K followers), at an ACC.15 session devoted to social media. Dr. Campbell, an electrophysiologist, is from North Carolina Heart and Vascular and a Fox News contributor. On his website (drkevincampbellmd.com) he states it simply: “Social media and cyberspace is where our patients ARE now and where we NEED to be in order to better meet their needs.” S ocial media and texting have become the prevailing means of connecting amongst a huge swath of humanity. The numbers are impressive: market leader Facebook averaged 1.04 billion daily active users in Dec. 2015 and 1.59 billion monthly active users. Instagram—that addictive photo-sharing site—boasts 400 million monthly active users and has hosted more than 40 billion photos shared, at an average daily rate of 80 million photos. The messaging app, Whatsapp, speaks for a smooth 900 million monthly active fans. But what does this mean for the provision of medical services or for physicians trying to better communicate with their patients? How can doctors harness the power of social media to better inform and empower patients? Can these technologies really improve patient adherence and, more importantly, outcomes, or is this all just a ‘flash in the pan’ phenomenon? #DisruptiveTechnology Like so much of new technology, social media offers a unique set of opportunities and challenges for the health care world. There is ongoing debate as to whether and how the medical profession should use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube to communicate (presumably more effectively) with patients and the public at large. But given how widely and rapidly these technologies have been adopted, the questions bear answering. Here are some quick stats from the Pew Research Center: • Nearly two-thirds of Americans own smartphones, putting text messaging, social networking, and apps literally at their fingertips 24 hours a day. • In a recent survey, 62% report using their phone to access medical information. • Among all Internet users, a 2014 survey showed that 74% of online adults use social networking sites, the most common by far being Facebook, followed by all the rest (such as Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, LinkedIn). ACC.org/CSWN Technology has exploded and is not only changing society, according to Peter Papadakos, MD, from the University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry in New York, it is massively changing the individual and his ability to interact with his fellow humans. Disruptive technology is never fun, but usually it does not alter the wiring of our brain. It happens to some degree with most heavy users, but Dr. Papadakos noted that there is also an extreme response called internet addiction disorder, where magnetic resonance imaging reveals hyperstimulation from intensive use that reconfigures the brain. #WhoDoctorsFollow Twitter may be having a tough time defending its business model lately, but despite stagnant user growth, it remains the “go-to social media channel for physicians, reporters, and many others in the online health ecosystem,” according to Greg Matthews (@chimoose; 21.2K Tweets, 16.2K followers). Mr. Matthews is the founder and managing director of MDigitalLife, a health ecosystem database that has mapped the digital footprint of more than 700,000 people and organizations worldwide who use social media. It is the first database to link physicians’ social properties to an official data source, the National Provider Identifier (NPI)—the 10-digit ID number issued to health care providers by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Mr. Matthews and MDigitalLife recently published a fascinating series called, “Who doctors ACTUALLY follow, 2016 edition.” They split the series into three parts, one each dedicated to reporters