Captive Insight Vol I | Page 47

Credit In the corporate bond universe, for example, the historical default rate for all Global corporate bond issuers considered “Investment Grade” has not been higher than 0.41% per year in the last 30 years, with that figure achieved in 2008. The default rate for AAA securities is zero. Naturally, if AAA rated securities offered the same yield as the rest of the investment grade global corporate bond universe, one would choose the AAA rated one. The yields are not the same, however, they are vastly different, benefitting the non-AAA investor with better returns in nearly all periods of the last 30 years regardless of the interest rate environment and nearly always by more than 0.41%, the highest default rate. In fact, corporate bonds tend to outperform AAA investments and US Treasuries in periods of both mildly rising and rapidly rising interest rates. Why? Income. You simply get compensated correctly with better income, at most times (2008 excepted), for taking what has turned out to historically be a very low level of credit risk, as judged by the actual default record. T: 441 298 4836 E: [email protected] W: www.butterfieldgroup.com The fixed income investment universe is vast, with investment choices much more numerous than the equities markets. Within this universe, captives have tended to limit themselves to an investable universe that eliminates most of the potential income generation available to the average fixed income investor. The limitation that imposed is on “credit risk”, the risk that any given fixed income investment will experience a default. In our experience, many captives have historically limited themselves to the two highest rating categories, with some only allowing AAA rated assets in their portfolios. This is beginning to change, as short rates have been zero for so long and providers of letters of credit become more sophisticated, but it is changing very slowly. Some of this is natural con ͕