Bulk Distributor Jul/Aug 18 | Page 7

Flexitanks & Bulk Liners July/August 2018 B ULK D ISTRIBUTOR 7 ĞĮĐŝƐƐƵĞƐŇĞdžŝƚĂŶŬŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ By the mid-1990s, a time when PVC one-way fl exitanks had already emerged and TOD had begun a bespoke manufacturing operation of its own, Deverill was reporting an 83 percent market share for TOD in the pages of Bulk Distributor. While no-one could completely verify this statistic, it was equally diffi cult for anyone to argue against it. With the further development of technology and the arrival of one-way polyethylene fl exitanks in 2000, the way was clear for major market expansion. However, neither Deverill nor anyone else could envisage the market reaching close to the fi gure of 1 million units annually that analysts believe has been realised today. What in the 1990s (a fl exitank era that had effectively been led by Deverill) was essentially a niche, specialised, low volume, but relatively high margin business, evolved into the mainstream, high volume, low margin industry that we see today. There must now be many modern fl exitank manufacturers, service providers and investors that owe their businesses and markets to the development work carried out by an earlier generation, which had faced many obstacles in getting the fl exitank concept off the ground. Probably many of them will not know of Jon Deverill when perhaps they should? The single word that best sums up JSD is ‘Pioneer’, a role that he fulfi lled for the fl exitank industry for many years with great enthusiasm and for which he was, by his character and personality, well suited. Deverill’s passing symbolises the end of an era. It is very unlikely that the bulk logistics sector will see his like again. T he transport in fl exitanks of bulk chemical products not classifi ed as dangerous goods is becoming an attractive alternative to using ISO tank containers. That much is known. Nevertheless, the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefi c) has seen fi t to issue guidelines to help chemical companies, their customers and logistics service providers in preventing or mitigating unsafe situations in the supply chain of fl exitanks by promoting known best practices. The guidelines remind potential users that fl exitanks should only be used for the transport of bulk liquids that are not classifi ed as dangerous good according to the provisions of the IMDG Code. In addition, a number of non-dangerous goods (not classifi ed as dangerous for sea transport) may have certain other hazards and be regulated as hazardous substances or mixture according to the ‘Globally Harmonized System of Classifi cation and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)’. For these goods a risk assessment should be carried out, taking into account the hazards of the product and the specifi c transport conditions. Based on the outcome of this risk assessment, a decision should be taken whether or not the product should be allowed for transport in fl exitanks. In addition, the cargo should be compatible with the fl exitank material of construction, entirely inert with that material and free from any risk of degradation or reaction. An evaluation of the product compatibility should be completed by the shipper and operator and form part of the risk assessment. The fl exitank manufacturer has to provide compatibility information and advice. Only products that have been assessed for risk and compatibility, and have been confi rmed by all partie s as safe and reliable, should be accepted for Cefi c’s guidelines strongly recommends the use of bulkheads of adequate strength and rigidity transport in a fl exitank. The risk assessment should take into account responsibilities for incident management. The guidelines go on to outline a number of equipment requirements. Containers used for carriage should be 20ft general purpose containers, rated to a minimum gross mass of 30,480kg and conforming to the provisions of ISO 1496. They should also display a valid CSC plate and shall be less than fi ve years old. Meet shipping line condition criteria, eg UCIRC (Unifi ed Container Inspection & Repair Criteria) or IICL (INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER LESSORS), and in addition the latest version of the COA Code of Practice, is strongly suggested. As for the fl exitank itself, this should be manufactured out of virgin, high quality, food contact approved materials (not recycled) and meet the requirements of the COA Code of Practice for Flexitanks and the latest version of PAS1008. The manufacturer should be certifi ed and listed in the COA Flexitank Quality Management List – FQML with the status COA Member Certifi cate of Compliance. The minimum requirement is that the manufacturer complies with PAS1008. The fi lling degree of the fl exitank should be in accordance with the manufacturers’ specifi cations and not exceed 24,000kg and 24,000 litres. Use of bulkheads of adequate strength and rigidity is strongly recommended to prevent pressure on the doors. This should also be considered for fl exitank systems designed to operate without bulkheads. Wooden bulkheads are however forbidden. There follow pages of recommendations for fi lling and discharging product, and an extensive check list for users to go through for each fl exitank carriage. The document points out that in the early days, fl exitank damage resulted in leaks, loss of cargo and subsequent clean-up. The root cause was typically attributed to inappropriate handling and fi tting and impact forces during transport. In recent years, fl exitank producers and operators have achieved major improvements in bag manufacturing, container selection criteria, as well as safe loading and unloading practices, which have led to a reduction of the number of spills and leaks. These improvements, in combination with a continuous search by shippers for lower cost options for the transport of certain types of non- dangerous cargoes, has resulted in a signifi cant increase of the number of fl exitank movements over the past decade and it is projected to increase to more than 1 million movements by 2020. Incidents involving fl exitanks pose a higher risk of loss of containment compared with tank containers, Cefi c says. The use of fl exitanks for the carriage of non-dangerous liquid chemicals should therefore only be carried out with the appropriate equipment and following the right operating procedures. ‘Best Practice Guidelines for loading, transport and unloading of fl exitanks’ can be downloaded at the Cefi c website. www.cefi c.org