barmag67 Jan. 2016 | Page 8

that we stay ahead of the curve? p.1 How can we maintain the trust and confidence both of the profession we regulate and of the public we serve? I should like to share some of our thinking about these challenges and invite comments. I should like in particular to focus in more detail on risk-based regulation in order to demonstrate that such an approach is going to be key to our success. Let me assure you that the approach we are taking is only part of our move to a different kind of regulation. The Board has been thinking hard about the way the BSB should do its work in future and our own role. My barrister and lay colleagues have shown admirable ambition and commitment and we shall be unveiling changes after consultation with our staff and the many experts and professionals who give so willingly of their time and experience. Since its inception in 2006, our focus has always been to uphold the standards of the profession and to promote excellence wherever we can. We are striving to build a deeper and more collaborative relationship with barristers’ chambers up and down the country. To make sure they have the systems in place to provide quality services to the public. I am very pleased to hear that the recent introduction of our Supervisory regime has met with a positive reaction from the profession. It is the task of the Bar, and its representative body, the Bar Council, to celebrate and market its particular strengths, high standards and professional values. But we at the BSB have the duty and responsibility to give independent assurance to the public that those claims are entirely valid and true. Last year, we became an authorised regulator of entities, a new form of barrister-led businesses. Although take-up has been a bit slow, we believe that these entities could help barristers to compete more effectively in the legal services marketplace, and that they should provide consumers with more choice. I am intrigued that our regulatory regime has been seen as so appealing that we even have a couple of solicitor-led practices switching to the BSB as their preferred regulator, due to the value for money we provide and reduced red tape. Over the years, the BSB has authorised barristers who have applied, and been accredited, to take instructions directly from the public and we have opened up the rules which allow them to conduct litigation. This has improved flexibility for the profession and access to justice for the public. Against the background of intense financial pressures, we remain committed to protecting the public and consumer interest and access to justice. We will do this while balancing those regulatory objectives against the sometimes competing objective of encouraging the independence, strength, diversity and effectiveness of the legal profession. It is in the interest of the public, the rule of