barmag67 Jan. 2016 | Page 35

in prison, or receive an unlimited fine, but these provisions do not presently apply to people who may have entered the country illegally or have overstayed a visa. The new bill proposes a new criminal offence of ‘Illegal Working’, which will mean that undocumented migrants can be arrested, imprisoned for up to 12 months and have their wages seized as the proceeds of crime. On top of these measures, immigration officials will have the power to search and seize properties and close down businesses. These will build on existing provisions which allow immigration officials to deport those found guilty of working illegally. By compounding existing punitive powers, this bill could drive an already vulnerable and impoverished minority even further away from much-needed support and leave them more susceptible to exploitation by unscrupulous employers. By lumping together labour market enforcement – designed to tackle exploitation – and immigration enforcement – designed to seek out and exclude certain people from the country – this bill could foster a culture of fear, allowing exploitative employers to hold even greater sway over undocumented workers who will face the constant threat of losing whatever meagre income they may have managed to amass from working in often appalling conditions. Another feature of forced labour within the UK, and one which this legislation does not sufficiently address, is poor awareness. Many victims, often unbeknownst to them, actually have rights to work as EU nationals to work in the UK. According to the National Crime Agency (NCA) Strategic Assessment ‘The Nature and Scale of Human Trafficking in 2013 (published 30/09/2014),78% of potential victims exploited for labour are EEA nationals who are working legally in the UK. The hostile climate fostered by legislation like this will do little to encourage people like this to make enquiries into the exact nature of their legal status, thus inadvertently exacerbating the problem it may be seeking to tackle. Accommodation Another troubling measure included in the Bill is that which increases the punishment which can be imposed upon landlords who are found to have let property to undocumented migrants. Although the 2014 Act contained measures which meant that landlords who failed to check the status of their tenants could be fined, the new Bill goes further, and threatens landlord with imprisonment for up to 5 years. Given the complexity of many immigration cases and the difficulty which even seasoned experts can face when asked to decide a person’s precise status, landlords might be led to take the path of least risk which could ultimately amount to racial profiling. The very fact that some responsibility for initiating such complex cases is now being passed on to members of the public without legal or law enforcement expertise, is in itself a matter of grave concern. Asylum & Deportation Under the Asylum Support measures automatic support for families who have been refused asylum will be withdrawn, leaving parents and their children facing the possibility of hunger and homelessness with, in most cases, no leave to appeal. Most of the grounds upon which people could appeal against deportation, meanwhile, were removed in the 2014 Act, leaving just human rights issues as a viable basis for such an appeal. The current bill takes this process further, making it legal to deport people even if they’ve launched an appeal on the grounds that the refusal of asylum was a breach of their basic human rights. This means that families who may have a strong case on the grounds of Human Rights issues will be forced to wait for the Home Office wheels of justice to turn whilst residing in the country which they sought to leave by seeking asylum in the first place. In light of the overarching aims of the UN Global Goals to promote human rights, tackle inequality and further global development efforts, it is unsett