Backspin Volume 3, Issue 11 | Page 9

Answers at Rest Moved by Blowing Tumbleweed], a wind-blown loose impediment is an outside agency. Rule 19-1b [Ball in Motion Deflected or Stopped by Outside Agency] states, in part, “If a player’s ball in motion after a stroke on the putting green is deflected … by any moving … outside agency …, the stroke is canceled. The ball must be replaced and replayed.” In stroke play, if you mistakenly believed that your ball was holed, and then made a stroke from the next teeing ground, you would be disqualified per Rule 3-2 [Failure to Hole Out]. 2. False. According to Decision 132/0.5 [Meaning of “Improve” in Rule 13-2], whether or not you have improved the area of your intended swing depends on whether you have created a potential advantage with respect to the area of your intended swing. It does not depend on the number of leaves that may have been dislodged. For example, even though you may have accidentally knocked down several leaves with your practice swing, you will not be penalized if there are still so many leaves or branches remaining that the area of your intended swing has not been materially affected. 3. True. Rule 23-1 [Loose Impediments – Relief] permits the removal of a loose impediment in a hazard when your ball is not lying in the hazard. See Decision 13-2/31 [Ball Outside Bunker; Stone in Bunker on Line of Play Pressed Down or Removed]. Please note that you may not smooth any footprints created on your line of play in the bunker as a result of your removing the leaf. See Decision 13-2/29 [Worsening and Then Restoring Line of Play]. 4. False. Per Decision 21/2 [Removing Grass Adhering to Ball], anything adhering to a ball is not a loose impediment. Thus, in this case, you would incur a one-stroke penalty under Rule 21 [Cleaning Ball] for removing the leaf. 5. False. Rule 23-1 states, “When a ball is in motion, a loose impediment that might influence the movement of the ball must not be removed.” Unfortunately, your good intentions would lead to a loss of hole penalty in match play or a two-stroke penalty in stroke play! 6. False. Per Decision 13-4/18.5 [Pine Cone Falls from Tree and Comes to Rest Behind Ball Lying in Bunker], the lie of your ball has been altered by natural causes. Thus, you are not permitted to remove the leaf in the hazard. It would different if an animate outside agency, e.g., a greenkeeper blowing leaves near the bunker, had caused the leaf to enter the bunker. 7. False. Per Rule 12-1 [Seeing Ball; Searching for Ball], you are not necessarily entitled to see your ball when making a stroke. In this case, removing the leaf is a breach of Rule 13-4 [Ball in Hazard; Prohibited Actions]. What’s your score? 9