Asia-Pacific Broadcasting (APB) April 2016 Volume 33, Issue 3 | Page 41

April 2016
X-PLATFORM 41

Benefits of IP-based production workflows

Can a production workflow become totally IP-based ? And what are the advantages of this kind of set-up ? Hiroyuki Takahama , assistant general manager , Content Creation Solutions Marketing , Professional Solutions Company ( PSAP ), Sony Corporation of Hong Kong , tells APB .
How can IP-based production workflows benefit broadcasters ? Hiroyuki Takahama : IP-based infrastructure gives broadcasters the level of flexibility that will not only improve productivity , but will also provide significant cost savings for broadcasters , as they will no longer need to double their investment for each production system .
For example , Sony ’ s IP Live Production System is a valueadded solution that broadcast quality HD and 4K / Ultra HD ( UHD ) video , audio , synchronisation signals and control data across the IP network through a single network cable . This increases operational efficiency while providing robust support for high-value modalities . Further , the system is designed to integrate seamlessly into existing SDI infrastructure ,
Sony ’ s format-agnostic , IP-based live production products allow all devices to be connected , and all signal types transmitted , via a single Ethernet cable from SD to 4K / UHD and beyond .
bringing increased reliability and scalability with reduced system costs . Sony ’ s IP Live System streamlines and modernises live broadcast workflows , in addition to supporting next-generation technologies emerging in content creation .
What should broadcasters look for before they choose any IP-based production solution ?
Takahama : One major consideration that broadcasters should look out for would be the interoperability among the wide variety of compatible products and software available in the market to support robust workflows . Sony is actively forging cooperative links with leading third-party vendors .
These developers and vendors can selectively incorporate the technology , and Sony will support them with the provision of technical support , connectivity testing and other assistance to facilitate product development . Currently , more than 30 leading companies support Sony ’ s IP Live Production System .
Another fundamental requirement would be an ecosystem of compatible standards and practices . Sony has been an early and eager participant in the European Broadcast Union ( EBU ) and Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( SMPTE ) standardisation processes , and has contributed significantly in various projects . These include ST2059-2 Precision Time Protocol ( PTP ) SMPTE profile , SMPTE ST 2022 , Professional Networked Streamed Media ( JT-NM ), SMPTE Media Flow Management Study Group , among others .
cloud provides a single infrastructure that is being managed from a single place , reducing operational and management costs . The cloud infrastructure offers unified selfprovisioning , easy installation and configuration , as well as simplified upgrades . n Scalability and elasticity : Moving to the cloud increases scalability and elasticity , as the video layer can be scaled independently from the storage layer . For example , during prime time , significant compute and streaming is required , which is provisioned automatically . These shared resources can be released back to the cloud once they are no longer required and used by other applications and services .
“ The advantages of cloudbased implementations are now coming to the foreground , offering the agility necessary to enable operators to push the boundaries of broadcasting ,” Paris-Mascicki says .
Indeed , using the cloud for playout promises to be most beneficial , says Sidney Ho , head of sales-APAC at Amagi . He points out to APB : “ When you look at traditional models of satellite delivery
for the playout of a single HD feed , the costs can range anywhere between US $ 250,000 and $ 350,000 per annum in Asia , and upwards of $ 400,000 per annum in Europe . In comparison , cloud-based storage and playout can offer the same benefits at a fraction of the traditional model cost , without compromising on broadcast quality and SLAs ( Service Level Agreements ).”
With cloud broadcast , there is no upfront investment and most providers offer a pay-as-you-go model that results in no Capex and low Opex , Ho says .
“ The other big advantage is that once broadcasters upload their content to the cloud , they will be able to distribute it to any location across the globe , as per their business expansion needs . In comparison , traditional satellite and fibre models require new infrastructure to be set up for each region , with relevant content being stored and managed from expensive data centres .”
Using cloud storage , broadcasters can completely eliminate the high costs associated with physical data centres for storage and archi-
val , and in addition , cloud playout for disaster recovery is emerging as the most prominent of the use cases , Ho says , as this method is a departure from the current approach of managing an expensive parallel satellite infrastructure to de-risk in case of disasters .
He adds : “ When using cloud technologies , broadcasters can activate the parallel feed only when required . This way , broadcasters can offset a bulk of Capex and Opex that they may have allocated towards disaster recovery infrastructure .”
With all these tantalising prospects the cloud offers to playout , what should broadcasters keep in mind when choosing the right cloud partner ?
Ericsson ’ s Paris-Mascicki says flexibility and adaptability are crucial .
“ Regional laws are changing , and new services are demanding more storage and processing requirements . A broadcaster needs a vendor that can ensure seamless solutions over time . As things change , a flexible infrastructure will allow for ease and speed in
Amagi offers an overarching cloud broadcast platform , Cumulus , that encompasses content preparation , channel playout , delivery and monetisation .
adding new services , storage allotments and devices .”
Also , there is often a business or technical need to supply a hybrid solution — some cloud , some dedicated hardware , she says . “ A company which allows for seamless augmentation and replacement of legacy TV services with new cloud-based solutions will mitigate a great deal of risk , as well as increase your time-to-market .”
Amagi ’ s Ho gives some pointers as well . He says some of the aspects that broadcasters may want to consider are the following : n Future-readiness of the solution in terms of over-the-top extension , ad-insertion , channel regionalisation , monetisation , and 4K / Ultra HD support . n Ability to deliver live content .
n Ability of the solution to stitch a broadcast workflow supporting media asset management , subtitling , QC and voice-overs , among others . n Support for digital video effects including credit squeeze and L-Bands , among others . n Dynamic graphics insertion capability , preferably based on Adobe After Effects , as it overcomes limitations of traditional template-driven graphics solutions . n Military-grade data security for the cloud and at the edge devices , if any . n Flexibility to include lastminute changes to playlists . n 24x7 multi-channel monitoring with well-defined SLAs n Remote playout management .

How broadcasters can play the OTT monetisation game – and win

by jim clarke
Given the rapid proliferation of video-ondemand ( VoD ) and over-the-top ( OTT ) services , many broadcasters still struggle to keep up with the impact that these technology trends are having on their traditional broadcast platforms .
The challenges of introducing new services are two-fold . First , it requires a change in management mindset to recognise that OTT has the potential to bring additional revenue from content , rather than cannibalising the traditional business . Second , it needs to be accompanied by the technological readiness to match that mindset .
Taking the first challenge into consideration , at the recent CASBAA OTT 2016
Summit in Singapore , more than 80 % of survey respondents cited OTT as being significant to their future business .
The result from this survey validates the point that broadcasters are aware of the threat posed by standalone OTT competitors — such as Netflix and YouTube — to their business .
The business imperative is for broadcasters to see themselves as being a multi-screen operator instead of a TV-only operator . They must monetise their valuable content beyond the living room if they are to continue to grow their audiences and their revenues . As viewers ’ habits change — and they expect to be able to access content anywhere , at any time , on any device — the content providers and distributors need to adapt to viewers behaviour to avoid becoming irrelevant and obsolete .
The second challenge , technological readiness , is ensuring that TV infrastructure is integrating with OTT business requirements , and vice-versa . It is important that this convergence in technology platforms happens for costs to be minimised . It is undesirable to build two separate platforms in isolation or converge them in a non-seamless manner , with the risk of undermining your business plan from the
The business imperative is for broadcasters to see themselves as being a multi-screen operator instead of a TV-only operator . outset . The decision on whether or not to build something in-house or to deploy a cloud-based solution has important implications for future flexibility and scalability .
To help broadcasters monetise this OTT market transformation , Telstra has invested in a strategic set of capabilities including online video platform ( Ooyala ); an integrated advertising technology capability ( Video plaza ) and media logistics ( Nativ ). Together with other investments such as Globecast Australia , Telstra is uniquely placed to deliver a multi-screen capability to customers .
Jim Clarke is Head of Marketing , Products & Pricing – International , Telstra