ASH Clinical News September 2015 | Page 21

PAID ADVERTISEMENT Biologics, Biosimilars and the United States: An Overview BIOSIMILARS VERSUS BIOLOGICS: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? The first biosimilar has been approved in the United States, paving the way for many others that are certain to follow. According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), biosimilars are defined as biological products that are highly similar to an FDA-approved biological product (also called the reference product), with no clinically meaningful differences in safety and effectiveness. Only minor differences in clinically inactive components are permitted.1 This definition is closely aligned with that of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the World Health Organization (WHO).2,3 Biological products, or biologics, vary widely and can comprise a complex combination of proteins, nucleic acids and posttranslational elements such as sugars, or they may be living entities such as cells and tissues. For the purposes of this discussion, we are focused on recombinant therapeutic proteins. Biologics are isolated from a variety of natural sources—human, animal or microorganism—and are produced using biotechnology and/or other innovative technologies.4 DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF BIOSIMILARS IN THE UNITED STATES Biologics have been revolutionary in the treatment of many diseases, including cancer, multiple sclerosis and chronic kidney disease. However, relative to the number of patients treated, biologics account for a disproportionate amount of healthcare resources and continue to outpace overall pharmaceutical spending growth. In 2002, biologics had global sales of $46 billion in US dollars, and this figure is expected to reach $221 billion by 2017.5 In 2010, eight of the 10 highest-expenditure drugs were biologics, accounting for $8 billion in Medicare Part B spending.6 Conversely, biosimilars have been predicted to lead to a $250 billion reduction in US spending on biologic drugs for the years 2014 to 2024.7 Global Biologics Sales, 2002-20175 $169 $106 $46 $221 billion billion billion billion 2002 2007 2012 2017 (projected) Biologics continue to outpace overall spending growth and are expected to represent 19% to 20% of global market value by 2017.5 Drug Development Comparison8 Smallmolecule Generic $1-5 million Originator Biologic $375 million ($1.33 billion*) Biosimilar $100-200 million Time in years: 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 *If discovery and development costs of failed products are included. PATHWAYS FOR DRUG APPROVAL: BIOSIMILARS BREAKING NEW GROUND Generics and small-molecule drugs Small-molecule drugs, such as aspirin, and their accompanying generics are approved via the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). For decades, new small-molecule drugs have been regulated and controlled with the New Drug Application (NDA) process.9 FDA approval is based on demonstration of safety and efficacy. Generics must demonstrate bioequivalence for FDA approval and are approved via an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) process established by the Hatch-Waxman Amendments enacted in 1984.10 Biologics Although biologics must also prove safety and efficacy to obtain FDA approval, the pathway is regulated differently through the biologics license application (BLA), or Section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act, rather than an NDA. Both the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) are responsible for regulation of therapeutic biological products. A biologics license is issued if the biological product, the manufacturing process and the manufacturing facilities meet the requirements to ensure the continued safety, purity and potency of the biological product.11 Biosimilars The abbreviated, or tailored, licensure pathway for biological products shown to be “biosimilar” to or “interchangeable” with an FDA-licensed biological product became possible when the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act was signed into law as part of the Affordable Care Act in 2010.1 Proposed biosimilars must scientifically demonstrate that there are no clinically meaningful differences from the reference biological product in terms و