ASH Clinical News May 2017 NEW | Page 40

Research from ASH ’ s newest peer-reviewed journal , Blood Advances in a Different Vein

Investigating Trends in Survival Outcomes Among the Oldest Patients with DLBCL

The probability of developing non- Hodgkin lymphoma ( NHL ) increases with age . Thus , as the U . S . population ages , a greater number of patients are at risk for acquiring NHL . This includes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ( DLBCL ) – a disease with a mean age at diagnosis of 70 years . People > 80 years old now comprise more than one-quarter of those ≥65 years old , but , because of their multiple comorbidities , poor performance status , and concerns about chemotherapyinduced toxicities , are rarely included in clinical trials of DLBCL .
Unfortunately , that has led to a lack of consensus regarding treatment in this population , according to Upama Giri , MD , and Michael G . Martin , MD , both from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis , who published a research letter in Blood Advances analyzing survival outcomes in patients who were ≥80 years old at the time of DLBCL diagnosis .
Drs . Giri and Martin conducted a population-based study of data from the National Cancer Institute ’ s Surveillance , Epidemiology , and End Results ( SEER ) database , identifying 14,386 cases diagnosed with DLBCL between 1983 and 2013 .
The data were split into three cohorts :
• cohort 1 : cases diagnosed between 1983 and 1996 ( n = 2,578 )
• cohort 2 : cases diagnosed between 1997 and 2005 ( n = 5,131 )
• cohort 3 : cases diagnosed between 2006 and 2013 ( n = 6,677 )
“ These study periods were selected since rituximab was approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory , low‐grade or follicular , B‐cell NHL in 1997 , and its approval was extended to treatment of DLBCL in 2006 ,” the authors explained .
Each cohort was further divided into two groups : Group A included patients 80-89 years old and group B included patients ≥90 years old .
The authors measured overall survival ( OS ; calculated as the time from diagnosis until death from any cause or date of last follow‐up ) and diseasespecific survival ( DSS ; calculated as the time from diagnosis until death from DLBCL or date of last follow‐up ) at 24 months .
OS and DSS for both groups and for all survival periods increased over time ; this survival increase was markedly higher for patients in group A than in group B . In group A , rates of 6- , 12- , and 24-month OS and DSS increased significantly over time ( p < 0.005 and p = 0.04 ). In group B , rates of 12- and 24-month OS increased significantly over time , but
there was no significant difference in DSS over time ( p value not provided ). See the TABLE for rates of OS and DSS at various timepoints .
Multivariate analyses identified several factors associated with survival :
• hazard ratio ( HR ) for year of diagnosis = 0.87 for cohort 2 vs . cohort 1 ( 95 % CI 0.811‐0.926 ; p < 0.005 ) and 0.76 for cohort 3 vs . cohort 1 ( 95 % CI 0.710‐0.808 ; p < 0.005 ), meaning survival improved in latter years .
• HR for increasing age at diagnosis = 1.43 for group B vs . group A ( 95 % CI 1.334‐1.529 ; p < 0.005 ), meaning survival was better for younger patients .
• HR for Ann Arbor stage = 1.27 ( 95 % CI 1.241‐1.292 ; p < 0.005 ), indicating worse survival for higher-stage disease .
Drs . Giri and Martin provided several possible explanations for this improved survival , including the introduction of rituximab , better control of comorbidities , and improved performance status in older patients . All of these factors “ could have contributed to more physicians and patients willing to proceed with treatment and this improvement in survival ,” they noted . “ More prospective studies are needed in the very old patient population , taking into consideration the comorbidities associated with these age groups to clearly define guidelines for management of DLBCL in this population ,” the authors concluded .
The study ’ s findings were limited by the nature of SEER data , since information regarding comorbidities and modalities of treatment are not available . ●
REFERENCE
Giri U , Martin MG . Survival outcomes in the very elderly with DLBCL prior to and after the introduction of rituximab : a US population-based study . Blood Adv . 2017 ; 1:615-8 .
TABLE . Rates of Overall and Disease-Specific Survival
Group A ( n = 2,239 )
Cohort 1 ( n = 2,578 )
Group B ( n = 339 )
Overall Survival
Group A ( n = 4,436 )
Cohort 2 ( n = 5,131 )
Group B ( n = 695 )
Group A ( n = 5,740 )
Cohort 3 ( n = 6,677 )
Group B ( n = 937 )
Group A ( n = 2,239 )
Cohort 1 ( n = 2,578 )
Group B ( n = 339 )
Disease-Specific Survival
Group A ( n = 4,436 )
Cohort 2 ( n = 5,131 )
Group B ( n = 695 )
Group A ( n = 5,740 )
Cohort 3 ( n = 6,677 )
3-month 67.1 % 54.0 % 67.2 % 58.4 % 68.5 % 58.1 % 72.0 % 59.0 % 71.8 % 64.5 % 72.6 % 64.4 % 6-month 51.6 % 38.5 % 55.9 % 42.4 % 57.5 % 44.9 % 59.0 % 46.7 % 62.0 % 51.5 % 62.9 % 52.1 % 12-month 37.0 % 25.3 % 42.4 % 30.5 % 47.2 % 34.2 % 45.0 % 35.8 % 49.3 % 41.2 % 53.6 % 43.0 % 24-month 25.0 % 16.2 % 32.3 % 19.6 % 39.0 % 23.3 % 33.5 % 29.2 % 40.6 % 32.5 % 46.9 % 33.7 %
Group B ( n = 937 )
38 ASH Clinical News May 2017