ASH Clinical News May 2015 | Page 52

Literature Scan “ esearch will need to determine R if even more sensitive methods of MRD measurement can improve our precision in predicting outcome.” • Standard-risk patients with MRD levels ≥1 percent: 65.1 percent —CHING-HON PUI, MD Table 5 Post-Baseline Laboratory Abnormalities by CTCAE Grade in ≥ 5% of Patients and at Least 2% Greater in the GAZYVA Treated Arm (Stage 1) GAZYVA + Chlorambucil n = 241 Investigations Chlorambucil n = 116 All Grades All Grades Grades % 3–4 % Grades % 3–4 % Hematology Neutropenia 78 48 53 27 Lymphopenia 80 40 9 3 Leukopenia 84 37 12 <1 Chemistry Hypocalcemia 38 3 33 2 Hyperkalemia 33 5 18 3 Hyponatremia 30 8 12 3 AST (SGOT increased) 29 1 16 0 Creatinine increased 30 <1 20 2 ALT (SGPT increased) 27 2 16 0 Hypoalbuminemia 23 <1 15 <1 Alkaline phosphatase 18 increased 0 11 0 Hypokalemia 1 5 <1 15 Table 6 Post-Baseline Laboratory Abnormalities by CTCAE Grade in ≥ 5% of Patients and at Least 2% Greater in the GAZYVA Treated Arm (Stage 2) Investigations GAZYVA + Chlorambucil n = 336 Rituximab + Chlorambucil n = 321 All Grades All Grades Grades % 3–4 % Grades % 3–4 % Hema tology Neutropenia 76 46 69 41 Lymphopenia 80 39 50 16 Leukopenia 16 84 35 62 Thrombocytopenia 48 13 40 8 Anemia 39 10 37 10 Chemistry Hypocalcemia 37 3 32 <1 Hyperkalemia 14 1 10 <1 Hyponatremia 26 7 18 2 AST 27 (SGOT increased) 2 21 <1 ALT 28 (SGPT increased) 2 21 1 Hypoalbuminemia 23 <1 16 <1 Infusion Reactions: The incidence of infusion reactions was 65% with the first infusion of GAZYVA. The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions was 20% with 7% of patients discontinuing therapy. The incidence of reactions with subsequent infusions was 3% with the second 1000 mg and < 1% thereafter. No Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions were reported beyond the first 1000 mg infused. Of the first 53 patients receiving GAZYVA on the trial, 47 (89%) experienced an infusion reaction. After this experience, study protocol modifications were made to require pre-medication with a corticosteroid, antihistamine, and acetaminophen. The first dose was also divided into two infusions (100 mg on day 1 and 900 mg on day 2). For the 140 patients for whom these mitigation measures were implemented, 74 patients (53%) experienced a reaction with the first 1000 mg (64 patients on day 1, 3 patients on day 2, and 7 patients on both days) and < 3% thereafter [see Dosage and Administration (2)]. Neutropenia: The incidence of neutropenia reported as an adverse reaction was 38% in the GAZYVA treated arm and 32% in the rituximab treated arm, with the incidence of serious adverse events being 1% and < 1%, respectively (Table 4). Cases of late-onset neutropenia (occurring 28 days after completion of treatment or later) were 16% in the GAZYVA treated arm and 12% in the rituximab treated arm. (7%), with the incidence of Grade 3–4 events being 10% and 3%, respectively (Table 4). The difference in incidences between the treatment arms is driven by events occurring during the first cycle. The incidence of thrombocytopenia (all grades) in the first cycle were 11% in the GAZYVA and 3% in the rituximab treated arms, with Grade 3–4 rates being 8% and 2%, respectively. Four percent of patients in the GAZYVA treated arm experienced acute thrombocytopenia (occurring within 24 hours after the GAZYVA infusion). The overall incidence of hemorrhagic events and the number of fatal hemorrhagic events were similar between the treatment arms, with 3 in the rituximab and 4 in the GAZYVA treated arms. However, all fatal hemorrhagic events in patients treated with GAZYVA occurred in Cycle 1. Tumor Lysis Syndrome: The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 tumor lysis syndrome was 2% in the GAZYVA treated arm versus 0% in the rituximab treated arm. Musculoskeletal Disorders: Adverse events related to musculoskeletal disorders (all events from the System Organ Class), including pain, have been reported in the GAZYVA treated arm with higher incidence than in the rituximab treated arm (18% vs. 15%). Liver Enzyme Elevations: Hepatic enzyme elevations have occurred in patients who received GAZYVA in clinical trials and had normal baseline hepatic enzyme levels (AST, ALT, and ALP). The events occurred most frequently within 24-48 hours of the first infusion. In some patients, elevations in liver enzymes were observed concurrently with infusion reactions or tumor lysis syndrome. In the pivotal study, there was no clinically meaningful difference in overall hepatotoxicity adverse events between all arms (4% of patients in the GAZYVA treated arm). Medications commonly used to prevent infusion reactions (e.g., acetaminophen) may also be implicated in these events. Monitor liver function tests during treatment, especially during the first cycle. Consider treatment interruption or discontinuation for hepatotoxicity. 6.2 Immunogenicity Serum samples from patients with previously untreated CLL were tested during and after treatment for antibodies to GAZYVA. Of the GAZYVA treated patients, 7% (18/271) tested positive for anti-GAZYVA antibodies at one or more time points. Neutralizing activity of anti-GAZYVA antibodies has not been assessed. Immunogenicity data are highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the test methods used. Additionally, the observed incidence of a positive result in a test method may be influenced by several factors, including sample handling, timing of sample collection, drug interference, concomitant medication, and the underlying disease. Therefore, comparison of the incidence of antibodies to GAZYVA with the incidence of antibodies to other products may be misleading. Clinical significance of anti-GAZYVA antibodies is not known. 6.3 Additional Clinical Trial Experience Worsening of Pre-existing Cardiac Conditions: Fatal cardiac events have been reported in patients treated with GAZYVA. 7 DRUG INTERACTIONS No formal drug interaction studies have been conducted with GAZYVA. 8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C Risk Summary There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of GAZYVA in pregnant women. Women of childbearing potential should use effective contraception while receiving GAZYVA and for 12 months following treatment. GAZYVA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Mothers who have been exposed to GAZYVA during pregnancy should discuss the safety and timing of live virus vaccinations for their infants with their child’s healthcare providers. Animal Data In a pre- and post-natal development study, pregnant cynomolgus monkeys received weekly intravenous doses of 25 or 50 mg/kg obinutuzumab from day 20 of pregnancy until parturition. There were no teratogenic effects in animals. The high dose results in an exposure (AUC) that is 2.4 times the exposure in patients with CLL at the recommended label dose. When first measured on day 28 postpartum, obinutuzumab was detected in offspring, and B cells were completely depleted. The B-cell counts returned to normal levels, and immunologic function was restored within 6 months after birth. Infection: The incidence of infections was similar between GAZYVA and rituximab treated arms. Th irty-eight percent of patients in the GAZYVA treated arm and 37% in the rituximab treated arm experienced an infection, with Grade 3–4 rates being 11% and 13%, respectively. Fatal events were reported in 1% of patients in both arms. 8.3 Nursing Mothers It is not known whether obinutuzumab is excreted in human milk. However, obinutuzumab is excreted in the milk of lactating cynomolgus monkeys and human IgG is known to be excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from obinutuzumab, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. Thrombocytopenia: The overall incidence of thrombocytopenia reported as an adverse reaction was higher in the GAZYVA treated arm (14%) compared to the rituximab treated arm Similarly, the investigators found that those low-risk patients who initially had a day 19 MRD level of ≥1 percent but were able to convert to an MRD-negative status by day 46 had a better event-free survival rate after 10 years than those from the same risk group who still had detectable MRD on day 46 (88.9% vs. 59.2%, respectively). 8.5 Geriatric Use Of 336 previously untreated CLL patients who received GAZYVA in combination with chlorambucil, 273 patients (81%) were ≥ 65 years of age and 156 patients (46%) were ≥ 75 years of age. The median age was 74 years. Of the 156 patients ≥ 75 years of age, 72 (46%) experienced serious adverse events and 11 (7%) experienced adverse events leading to death. For 180 patients < 75 years of age, 59 (33%) experienced a serious adverse event and 4 (2%) an adverse event leading to death. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between patients ≥ 75 years of age and those < 75 years of age [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. 8.6 Renal Impairment Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis, a baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 30 mL/min does not affect the pharmacokinetics of GAZYVA. GAZYVA has not been studied in patients with a baseline CrCl < 30 mL/min [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 8.7 Hepatic Impairment GAZYVA has not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment. 10 OVERDOSAGE There has been no experience with overdose in human clinical trials. Doses ranging from 50 mg up to and including 2000 mg per infusion have been administered in clinical trials. For patients who experience overdose, treatment should consist of immediate interruption or reduction of GAZYVA and supportive therapy. 17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Advise patients to seek immediate medical attention for any of the following: • Signs and symptoms of infusion reactions including dizziness, nausea, chills, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, breathing problems, or chest pain [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) and Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. • Symptoms of tumor lysis syndrome such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and lethargy [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4) and Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. • Signs of infections including fever and cough [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) and Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. • Symptoms of hepatitis including worsening fatigue or yellow discoloration of skin or eyes [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. Dr. Pui believes that the results from this study also show that measuring MRD levels just twice during remission induction – rather than multiple times during the more than two years of treatment – was sufficient to guide treatment for most pediatric ALL patients. These findings could also potentially save money and protect patients from risks associated with MRD testing. The team of investigators from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital plan to examine the ability of MRD measurements to reduce treatment for patients with an extremely low risk of relapse to improve quality of life and reduce treatment-related morbidity. “By contrast, for patients with MRD levels ≥1 percent on day 19, we will test more intensive or novel therapy during and after remission induction to attempt to improve cure rate,” he added. Dr. Pui acknowledges, however, that MRD is not a perfect predictor of relapse risk: “For example, relapse occurred in 26 of 430 patients with undetectable MRD at the end of continuation treatment.” By contrast, relapse occurred in only two of the 11 patients who had decreasing MRD levels between the end of induction and week 7 of maintenance therapy who were treated with chemotherapy alone. “Research will need to determine if even more sensitive methods of MRD measurement can improve our precision in predicting outcome,” Dr. Pui noted. ● Reference Pui CH, Pei D, Coustan-Smith E, et al. Clinical utility of sequential minimal residual disease measurements in the context of riskbased therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:465-74. • New or changes in neurological symptoms such as confusion, dizziness or loss of balance, difficulty talking or walking, or vision problems [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Advise patients of the need for: • Periodic monitoring of blood counts [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6 and 5.7) and Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. • Avoid vaccinations with live viral vaccines [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)]. • Patients with a history of hepatitis B infection (based on the blood test) should be monitored and sometimes treated for their hepatitis [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. GAZYVA® [obinutuzumab] Initial US Approval: 2013 Manufactured by: Genentech, Inc. Code Revision Date: December 2014 A Member of the Roche Group South San Francisco, CA 94080-4990 GAZYVA is a registered trademark of Genentech, Inc. U.S. License No: 1048 GAZ/011615/0009 1/15 © 2015 Genentech, Inc. High-Cost Surveillance Imaging Falls Short on Survival Benefit in DLBCL 8.4 Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of GAZYVA in pediatric patients has not been established. Surveillance imaging to monitor patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first remission ma y be common practice, but a new cost-effectiveness analysis has found May 2015