ASH Clinical News March 2015 | Page 42

You Make the Call Each month in “You Make the Call,” we’ll pick a challenging clinical question submitted through the Consult-a-Colleague program and post the expert’s response. But, what would YOU do? We’ll also pose a submitted question and ask you to send your responses. See how your answer matches up to the experts’ in the next print issue. This month, John Sweetenham, MD, advises on treatment options for an elderly patient with Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical Dilemma: I have a 90-year-old female patient with relatively poor performance status and newly diagnosed bulky, symptomatic Hodgkin lymphoma. What treatment options does she have – chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), gemcitabine as a single agent, brentuximab vedotin, others? I worry that she won’t be able to tolerate ABVD. Experts Make the Call Next Month’s Clinical Dilemma: I have a 23-year-old male patient with nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma – stage IIIb with bulky mediastinal disease and an International Prognostic Index score of 3. He has received two cycles of ABVD, resulting in a 21 percent decrease in carbon monoxide diffusing capasity (DLCO) and symptomatic bleomycin lung toxicity. A 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scan after two cycles revealed two persistent areas of FDG avidity: persistent disease versus disease secondary to inflammation from bleomycin lung damage. His symptoms did improve with steroid treatment. Subsequently, he received four cycles of ABVD. A PET scan performed after four cycles of chemtherapy was negative, and we are currently awaiting a post-treatment PET scan. In someone with bleomycin lung injury, Would you recommend radiation therapy post-chemotherapy, due to initial bulky disease and persistent FDG avidity in interim PET scan? John Sweetenham, MD Senior Director of Clinical Affairs Executive Medical Director Huntsman Cancer Institute Salt Lake City, UT As you know, treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma in elderly patients is challenging – mainly due to the risks of excessive treatment-related toxicity, and the fact that older patients with the disease have a significantly worse prognosis than younger patients. Since your patient is not a candidate for ABVD, I am assuming that her performance status is also poor, which will limit therapeutic options. I think brentuximab vedotin is worth considering in this scenario. The risk of peripheral neuropathy associated with this treatment, however, can be dose-limiting. Even so, I think this is one of the most active single agents for Hodgkin lymphoma and a reasonable option – especially because the peripheral neuropathy can be managed by dose reduction if it interferes with her activities of daily living. Since this is a palliative rather than curative situation, oral chlorambucil is another option to consider if the patient does not tolerate brentuximab vedotin. I know it sounds unlikely, but chlorambucil does have single-agent activity in Hodgkin lymphoma and was a component of front-line regimens for Hodgkin lymphoma in younger patients in Europe for many years. It is certainly well tolerated. Finally, rituximab as a single agent may also be worth considering. It has a 20 to 30 percent response rate in classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and I have had some impressive anecdotal experiences with this approach. How would you respond? Email us at [email protected]. Consult a Colleague Through ASH is a service for ASH members that helps facilitate the exchange of information between hematologists and their peers. ASH members can seek consultation on clinical cases from qualified experts in 11 categories: • Anemias • Hematopoietic cell transplantation • Hemoglobinopathies • Hemostasis/thrombosis • Lymphomas • Lymphoproliferative disorders • Leukemias • Multiple myeloma & Waldenström macgroglobulinemia • Myeloproliferative Disorders • Myelodysplastic Syndromes • Thrombocytopenias Assigned volunteer (“colleagues”) will respond to inquiries within two business days (either by email or phone). DISCLAIMER: ASH does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, or opinions, and disclaims any representation, warranty, or guaranty as to the same. Reliance on any information provided in this article is solely at your own risk. 38 ASH Clinical News Have a puzzling clinical dilemma? Submit a question, and read more about Consult-a-Colleague volunteers at hematology.org/Clinicians/Consult.aspx or scan the QR code. *If you have a request related to a hematologic disorder not listed here, please email your recommendation to [email protected] so it can be considered for addition in the future. March 2015