ASH Clinical News March 2015 | Page 29

CLINICAL NEWS “ he analysis provided a T good example of how genome sequencing can help provide clarity in a clinically ambiguous case.” —DAVID P. STEENSMA, MD did not yield a diagnosis. After discovering that the patient’s mother and sister also had minor hematologic abnormalities, the investigators suspected a genetic cause may be the culprit. “We performed whole-exome sequencing to try to better understand her disorder and found a dominant negative mutation in ALAS2, a gene that is closely associated with X-linked sideroblastic anemia; however, this patient did not have ring sideroblasts,” says David P. Steensma, MD, a co-author of the study. Because only female carriers were found to be affected, the researchers also wondered whether there may have been highly skewed X-inactivation toward the mutant allele; however, they were surprised to learn that the severity of the anemia phenotype was not associated with severe X-inactivation skewing. Instead, they found that cells expressing the mutant ALAS2 allele exhibited an early block in red blood cell production – leading to perturbed erythropoiesis in cells expressing the normal allele. This was most significant in the proband, who had 82 percent skewing toward the mutant allele. “In addition to providing an answer for the mechanism of anemia in this family, the analysis provided a good example of how genome sequencing can help provide clarity in a clinically ambiguous case,” Dr. Steensma said. ● Reference • Sankaran V, Ulirsch J, Tchaikovskii V, et al. X-linked macrocytic dyserythropoietic anemia in females with an ALAS2 mutation. J Clin Invest. 2015 February 23. [Epub ahead of print] Do Clinical Trials Underreport Cancer Drug Toxicities? Clinical trials may be underreporting patient toxicities from cancer drugs – by up to 75 percent in some cases – according to a new study that examined the discrepancies between physician-reported toxicities and reports from patients themselves. These study results, published recently in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, support greater incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into toxicity reporting in clinical trials. “Information available to oncologists and their patients about symptomatic toxicities of anticancer treatments is not based on direct report by prior patients, but instead on reports made by clinician assessment in clinical trials,” the study authors, led by Massimo Di Maio, MD, explained. “The accurate description of occurrence and severity of toxicity of anticancer agents is crucial for an informed evaluation of their risk-benefit ratio.” With the current study, Dr. Di Maio and colleagues examined the agreement (and disagreement) between physicianand patient-reported toxicities from three separate randomized trials of anticancer treatment: • the ELDA (Elderly Breast Cancer— Docetaxel Adjuvant) study of patients aged 65–79 years with earlystage breast cancer • the GECO (Gemcitabine–Coxib) trial of patients aged <70 years with