ASH Clinical News June 2016 | Page 23

CLINICAL NEWS classically associated with bi-allelic, but not single, mutations of the gene and has resulted in a change in the definition to require the presence of biallelic mutations. Due to the lack of prognostic significance of multilineage dysplasia in patients without MDS-associated cytogenetic findings and with a mutation of NPM1 or biallelic mutation of CEBPA, these mutations now supersede the presence of multilineage dysplasia in the classification. In addition, a provisional category of AML with mutated RUNX1 has been added to the classification for de novo AML.  Under the classification for AML, not otherwise specified, the subcategory of acute erythroid leukemia, erythroid/myeloid type (previously defined as having ≥50% bone marrow erythroid precursors and ≥20% myeloblasts among non-erythroid cells) has been removed. Myeloblasts are always counted as a percentage of total marrow cells, with the majority of these cases having less than 20 percent total blast cells, thus classified as MDS. Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage Preliminary data suggest that mixed phenotype acute leukemia with t(9;22) respond favorably to TKI treatment. New provisions have been added for B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL). For B-ALL, two provisional entities with recurrent genetic abnormalities have been recognized:  • B-ALL with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 »»Amplification of a portion of chromosome 21 »»Occurs in about 2% of children with ALL, especially older children with low WBC counts »»Associated with an adverse prognosis, which, to some extent, can be overcome with more aggressive therapy
 • B-ALL with translocations involving tyrosine kinases or cytokine receptors »»Associated with an adverse prognosis and responses of some cases to TKIs »»Difficult to define in the clinical setting Though studies have investigated the genetic mechanisms of T-ALL, assays have not yet been standardized and prognostic implications are still controversial.  REFERENCES 1. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The