ASH Clinical News January 2016 | Page 21

CLINICAL NEWS with daratumumab monotherapy. The objective response rate was 29 percent (95% CI 21-39%) with a median response duration of 7.4 months (range = 1.2-13.1 months). The most common treatmentrelated adverse events (occurring in ≥20% of patients) included infusion reactions, fatigue, nausea, back pain, pyrexia, cough, and upper respiratory tract infection. In addition, the most common laboratory abnormalities were lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. In its news release, the FDA noted that blood banks should be informed that patients are receiving daratumumab because the drug may interfere with certain tests that are done by blood banks (such as antibody screening) for patients who need a blood transfusion. Daratumumab was approved under the FDA’s accelerated approval program, which allows the approval of a drug to treat a serious or life-threatening disease based on clinical data showing the drug has an effect on a surrogate endpoint reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit to patients. As a condition of approval, Janssen Biotech, Inc., the drug’s manufacturer, is required by the FDA to perform a multicenter, randomized trial establishing the superiority of daratumumab over standard therapy to verify and describe the drug’s clinical benefit. Source: U.S. FDA press release, November 16, 2015. FDA Approves Modified Antihemophilic Factor for the Treatment of Hemophilia A The U.S. FDA approved antihemophilic factor (recombinant), PEGylated for use in patients 12 years old or older with hemophilia A. The new drug is approved for on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes, as well as to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes. The drug is a modified version of recombinant factor VIII, with an extended circulating halflife to last longer in the blood and potentially require less frequent injections than unmodified antihemophilic factor when used to reduce the frequency of bleeding. The approval of antihemophilic factor (recombinant), PEGylated was based on the results of a prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, phase III clinical trial of 137 adults and adolescents with he- ASHClinicalNews.org mophilia A. Patients were assigned to either twice-weekly prophylaxis (40-50 IU/kg; n=120) or on-demand treatment (10-60 IU/kg; n=17) with the modified factor. Previously treated patients in the twice-weekly prophylaxis arm had 95 percent fewer annual bleeds compared with those treated on-demand (median annual bleed rate = 1.9 vs. 41.5, respectively). During the study, 38 percent of prophylaxis-treated patients experienced zero bleeds. Moreover, 57 percent of patients experienced zero joint bleeds based on six months of prophylaxis. No safety concerns were identified during the trial. Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration press release, November 13, 2015. Medicare Proposes Coverage of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease, Myelofibrosis, and Multiple Myeloma The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its new proposed coverage policy for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) among Medicare patients. The proposal was a response to lobbying earlier this year from the National Marrow Donor Program and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation to include HSCT in the national coverage determination for sickle cell disease (SCD), myelofibrosis, and multiple myeloma (MM). Prior to this action, most Medicare services do not have a national coverage determination for HCT that includes SCD and myelofibrosis, meaning patients with these conditions can be found financially liable for HCT if a local medical director deemed the procedure medically unnecessary. In addition, Medicare does not currently cover HCT among patients with MM, regardless of the local region. This proposed change would add those three conditions to covered status under the process known as “coverage with evidence development.” This process is used by Medicare when the agency finds that the scientific evidence of a procedure’s efficacy is lacking in a particular population. Medicare agrees to pay for the service in exchange for the services’ providers gathering data, often using a registry. CMS is currently seeking comments on the proposed decision. Source: Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services. “Proposed decision memo for stem cell transplantation (multiple myeloma, myelofibrosis, and sickle cell disease) (CAG-00444R),” October 29, 2015. Medicare Releases Final Rules on Physician and Outpatient Hospital Payment for 2016 CMS announced final rules for physician and outpatient hospital payments, which will go into effect on January 1, 2016. Payment rules for the 2016 calendar year for End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System, Home Health Prospective Payment System, and the Physician Fee Schedule were finalized at the end of October. This is the first year that the Medicare physician fee schedule was not tied to the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) calculation, which was replaced by the Medicare and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Reauthorization Act (MACRA) in April 2015. As a result, the overall payment rate for Medicare in 2016 is nearly identical to the overall payment rate for the second half of 2015. “CMS is pleased to implement the first fee schedule since Congress acted to improve patient