ASH Clinical News Focus on Myeloid Malignancies | Page 23

TABLE . Factors Associated With DFS , OS , and NRM ( According to Multivariable Analyses ) 2 DFS
OS
NRM
Hazard ratio
p value
Hazard ratio
p value
Hazard ratio
p value
Transformation to AML
1.84
0.033
2.19
0.01
1.83
0.069
Not in complete remission at time of transplant
1.93
0.001
1.90
0.002
1.76
0.017
Female donor for male recipient
1.53
0.062
1.67
0.030
1.94
0.016
Myeloablative conditioning
1.47
0.048
1.56
0.026
1.70
0.023
Prophylactic cyclophosphamide treatment
0.49
0.038
0.44
0.025
0.40
0.027
DFS = disease-free survival ; OS = overall survival ; NRM = non-relapse mortality ; AML = acute myeloid leukemia
vivo T-cell depletion was performed in 34 ( 14.9 %) patients .
The rates of 3-year OS and disease-free survival ( DFS ) were 32 percent ( 95 % CI 26-41 ) and 29 percent ( 95 % CI 23-37 ), respectively . The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality ( NRM ) at 3 years was 49 percent ( 95 % CI 41-56 ), and NRM was particularly high in patients who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen , compared with those who received RIC ( 59 % vs . 40 %; p value not provided ), the authors noted .
Rates of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease ( GVHD ) and chronic GVHD were 31 percent ( 95 % CI 25-38 ) and 30 percent ( 95 % CI 23-36 ), respectively .
When restricting the analysis to patients who received cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis ( n = 102 ; 44.7 %), rates of 3-year OS and DFS were slightly higher than the overall patient population ( 38 % and 34 %), and the rate of NRM was reduced ( 41 %).
The researchers identified several factors associated with OS , DFS , and NRM , including transformation to AML , not in complete remission at time of transplant , a female donor for a male recipient , myeloablative conditioning regimen , and no use of cyclophosphamide ( TABLE ). The authors attributed the improvement in DFS over time to an increase in the use of prophylactic cyclophosphamide treatment , but noted that rates of NRM remain “ relatively high ,” even with cyclophosphamide treatment .
Authors of both analyses noted that missing data in the registries could have affected the study results .
References
1 . Schetelig J , de Wreede L , van Gelder M , et al . Long-term survival of patients with MDS after allogeneic transplantation : a report from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT . Oral abstract presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation , March 28 , 2017 ; Marseilles , France .
2 . Robin M , Porcher R , Ciceri F , et al . Haplo-identical transplantation ( haplo-HSCT ) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome ( MDS ): a report from the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation . Oral abstract presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation , March 28 , 2017 ; Marseilles , France .

Azacitidine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions Reduce Risk of Relapse in Post-Transplant AML and MDS

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation ( alloHCT ) is currently the only curative option for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia ( AML ) or myelodysplastic syndromes ( MDS ), relapse remains the most common cause of morbidity and mortality . In a prospective , open-label , phase II clinical trial , researchers evaluated whether a posttransplant strategy combining prophylactic or preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion ( DLI ) and the hypomethylating agent azacitidine could reduce the risk of post-transplant relapse .
At the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation , lead author Thierry Guillaume , MD , PhD , from the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire in Nantes , France , and colleagues reported that this combination led to a 3-year survival rate of 66 percent and a lower rate of relapse than historical controls .
The trial evaluated relapse rate and disease-free survival in 30 patients ( median age = 58 years ; range = 22-70 years ) with highrisk AML ( n = 20 ) or MDS ( n = 10 ) who received azacitidine and DLI post-alloHCT as prophylactic treatment . The patient ’ s disease status at the time of alloHCT was in first complete remission ( CR ; n = 16 ; 53 %), second CR ( n = 6 ; 20 %), refractory ( n = 5 ; 16 %), and upfront transplantation for MDS ( n = 3 ; 10 %). Cytogenetics were normal or intermediate for 15 patients and unfavorable for 15 patients – eight of whom had complex karyotype .
Azacitidine treatment began between 56 and 112 days post-transplant , at doses of 32 mg / m ² per day administered subcutaneously for 5 days every 28 days for up to 12 cycles ; 10 patients ( 33 %) completing all 12 cycles . However , 20 patients discontinued treatment because of graft-versus-host disease ( GVHD ; n = 11 ), relapse ( n = 5 ), infection ( n = 1 ), sudden death resulting from heart failure ( n = 1 ), or withdrawal of consent ( n = 2 ).
The first DLI was started following three cycles of azacitidine and discontinuation of immunosuppressive prophylaxis as long as the patient had no clinical signs of GVHD , uncontrolled infection , or a recent history of grade > 2 acute GVHD ( aGVHD ). Two additional DLIs were administered after the fifth and seventh cycles of azacitidine ( 8 and 16 weeks after the first DLI ).
DLIs were administered in the following doses : 5x10 6 , 1x10 7 , 5x10 7 CD3 + cells / kg for related donor alloHCTs and 1x10 6 , 5x10 6 , 1x10 7 CD3 + cells / kg for unrelated donor alloHCTs . Forty-one
May 2017 21