ASH Clinical News FINAL_ACN_3.14_FULL_ISSUE_DIGITAL | Page 126

Focus on Biosimilars The Big Business of Biosimilars Uptake of biosimilars to the market – and the potential savings – will depend on physician education and confidence. To gain approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a biosimilar must be proven to have highly similar pharmacologic, safety, and efficacy profiles to an already approved biologic product. The hope is that biosimilars will carry a very different price tag, though. “This is a very important opportunity for the health system to save billions in a way that maintains the highest standards of care for patients and their loved ones,” said Caleb Alexander, MD, co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness in Baltimore, Maryland. “There are exciting opportunities ahead for patients, providers, and the health system to get better value for their health-care dollar.” To speed approval, the Affordable Care Act included an abbreviated licensure pathway for biosimilars through the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act of 2009. According to the FDA, the goal was analogous to that of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Hatch-Waxman Act), which encouraged generic competition for drugs, but provided incen- tives for new drug innovation. 1 ASH Clinical News spoke with Dr. Alexander and other experts about how biosimilars might affect the pharmaceutical marketplace. The Economics of Biosimilars Unlike conventional medications, which are made through a synthetic chemical process, biologics are derived from nature and cannot be cloned. “Biosim- ilars are considered highly similar but not an exact copy,” said Joseph P. Fuhr Jr., PhD, adjunct profes- sor of pharmaceutical and health-care business at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia. “Biologics are generally liquids made in batches, and those batches can vary from one to the next.” There also is a vast economic difference between traditional pharmaceuticals and biologic products. The average daily cost of a conventional, chemi- cal drug in the U.S. is $2. At $45 per day, biologics cost approximately 20 times that amount. 2 In 2016, Roche, the manufacturer of bevacizumab, reported a group revenue of about $25 billion, driven largely by three of its biologic cancer drugs: rituximab, trastu- zumab, and bevacizumab. 3 If a biosimilar to any of those products acquired even a small share of the market, it would stand to earn a large sum. “Pharmaceutical manufacturers consider several factors when deciding whether to enter the market, including the risks and costs of entry and the expected return,” Dr. Alexander said. “But for a $6 billion drug like bevacizumab, for which the first cancer biosimilar was ap- —CALEB ALEXANDER, MD proved, I would expect “This is a very important opportunity for the health system to save billions in a way that maintains the highest standards of care for patients and their loved ones.” 124 ASH Clinical News to see other biosimilars down the pipeline soon.” Biosimilar manufacturers are not the only ones who stand to benefit from the introduction of more biosimilars to the marketplace. In theory, consumers win when there is increased competition. “We have limited experience in the U.S. with biosimilars,” said Dr. Alexander. “We don’t know exactly how they will be priced and how they will ultimately affect the economics of the pharmaceuti- cal marketplace.” However, basic laws of economics suggest that biosimilars will affect the pricing of their reference drugs, he added. Biosimilars Pricing Observations from the chemical drugs market, of which generic drugs make up 84 percent, suggest that health-care savings tend to accrue over time, according to Carlos Sattler, MD, vice president and head of clinical development and medical affairs at Sandoz, a division of Novartis that specializes in the development of biosimilars. “During the first six months after a manufac- turer loses exclusivity of its branded product, the market typically has three players maximum: the generic producer who was first to file for marketing authorization, the authorized generic manufactur- er, and the originator,” he explained. “Following the exclusivity period, we typically see a dozen or more competitors entering the market, which causes rapid price erosion. “The situation is different for more complex generics, where there are fewer players,” Dr. Sattler said. “The decline in originator sales tends to occur over a longer period. We expect a similar dynamic with biosimilars in the U.S.” Sandoz is the manufactu