ASH Clinical News December 2015 | Page 112

Interview Bridge Grant Winners Raise the Caps! While the ASH Bridge Grant program is designed to provide short-term relief to talented researchers, in the long term, continued investment in NIH is necessary to keep biomedical research moving forward. “When NIH does not ASH Officers Ken Anderson, MD, have the adequate funds to Stephanie Lee, MD, MPH, and Dasupport medical research, vid Williams, MD, are on the Hill science loses,” said ASH advocating for increased funding President David A. Williams, for NIH and oral chemotherapy MD. “When scientists aren’t parity. ASH urges Congress to funded, they spend more support biomedical research time applying for alternative so the field of hematology can continue to advance. grant funding than on scientific research and discovery, and some must reduce the size or close their laboratories completely.” Unfortunately, NIH’s ability to support promising research has been seriously hampered by a decade of flat funding, followed by sequestration cuts that have dramatically slashed the agency’s budget and kept budget caps tight, threatening medical research. To fight for increased NIH funding, ASH proudly cosponsored the Rally for Medical Research Capitol Hill Day on September 17, 2015 – a National Day of Action where healthcare agency delegates gathered to voice their support for increasing the NIH’s budget for biomedical research. All members of Congress, including those who support funding increases for NIH, need to hear from their constituents about the negative impact that cuts in funding have had (and may continue to have) on hematology research. This will not take much time, but will have a huge impact. Visit www. hematology.org/Advocacy for information about how you can help raise awareness about the need for increased funding or contact ASH Legislative Advocacy Manager Tracy Roades ([email protected]) with any questions. 110 ASH Clinical News experienced investigators to train the next generation of biomedical researchers. My competing renewal R01 grant was scored just outside the funding payline; this loss of funding threatened to dismantle a well-established hematology research program on the pathobiology of red blood cells. trainees with medical degrees it has led to a brain drain in the clinic; fellowship trainees no longer seem to consider careers at the translational interface of bench and bedside. How are you adjusting your research practice? The most ambitious and out-of-the-box projects no longer seem a good fit for NIH’s grant applications and increasingly conservative review process, which now seems to require multiple published papers and extensive preliminary data. The net effect of decreased funding, for me, is that it has become harder to plan ahead financially as I hire personnel and trainees that deserve multi-year commitments. Athar Chishti, PhD, Tufts University, Medford, MA How does NIH funding affect your career? NIH funding is the cornerstone of the American biomedical enterprise, and is particularly critical for investigators working at the research-intensive medical institutions, where the principal investigator’s salary recovery and graduate students’ stipends are supported by such grants. A lapse of funding leads to the loss of experienced staff and reagents, thus adversely affecting the ability of Why did you apply for an ASH Bridge Grant? Becaus HوH