ASH Clinical News ACN_4.1_FULL_ISSUE_DIGITAL | Page 41

CLINICAL NEWS CD22: A New Target for CAR T-Cell Therapy in Patients With B-ALL? The revolutionary chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies that gained approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2017 both target CD19; the success in targeting that antigen has prompted investigators to look for new targets. Results from a small, phase I, dose- escalation trial published in Nature Medicine suggest that targeting CD22 led to clinical activity against B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL), including leukemia that was resistant to anti-CD19 immunotherapy. Though the relapse rate with this therapy was high, “this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment,” commented Crystal Mackall, MD, director of the Park- er Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Stanford University and corresponding author of the study. “This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.” Terry J. Fry, MD, of the Pediatric Oncology Branch at the Center for Cancer Research at the National Institutes of Health’s National Cancer Institute, and co- authors evaluated the safety and potential efficacy of anti-CD22 CAR T-cell therapy in 21 pediatric and adult patients (median age = 19 years; range = 7-30 years) with relapsed or refractory B-ALL. All patients had undergone at least one prior hema- topoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and two had received two prior HCTs. Most pa- tients (n=17) had previously been treated with CD19-directed immunotherapy, including 15 patients who had received CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. Patients received one of three anti-CD22 CAR T-cell doses: 3×10 5 cells/kg (n=6), 1×10 6 cells/kg (n=7), and 3×10 6 cells/kg (n=8). Sixteen patients experienced cyto- kine release syndrome (CRS; grade 1 in 9 patients and grade 2 in 7 patients), a common adverse event (AE) associated with CAR T-cell therapy. CRS coincided with CAR T-cell expansion and occurred after day five of treatment, the researchers noted. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3, self-limited, non-infectious diarrhea during CRS) occurred in one patient at the first dose level (3×10 5 ), which required a protocol-specific expansion of the first dose level to six patients. No other DLTs were observed in patients at the first or second dose level (1×10 6 ). Two patients receiving dose level three (3×10 6 ) developed dose-limiting grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid dis- ease progression. Therefore, the researchers selected 1×10 6 anti-CD22 CAR T cells/kg as the recommended phase II dose; this dosing cohort was expanded to include 13 total patients. In the first 16 patients with available, complete assessments, transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2) were observed but returned to baseline levels by day 28 post-infusion. All patients who achieved remis- sion reported B-cell aplasia, including those who were not previously B-cell aplastic. Twelve of 21 patients (57%) achieved com- plete remission (CR), mostly patients at the MCL-1, a BCL-2 family member, is an in MCL-1–dependent AML 1-3 MCL-1 dependence may drive progression of AML 1,2 Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with high mortality and is challenging to treat, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 27%. 4,5 Standard therapies often fail to achieve the goal of inducing complete remission in 25%–50% of patients, and relapse is common even in patients who have an initial response to treatment. 1,5 Disease progression and treatment resistance in a subset * of AML have been associated with a key anti-apoptotic protein, myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL-1). 1,2 This is referred to as MCL-1 dependence. 6 Understanding the role of MCL-1 can inform therapeutic targeting strategies in AML. 7 Downregulation of MCL-1 to enable apoptosis of leukemic blasts may be a rational therapeutic strategy in MCL-1–dependent AML 7 The activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) is essential for the transcription of MCL-1 mRNA in leukemic blasts. 9,10 CDK9 Recruitment of CDK9 CDK9 RNA polymerase II MCL-1 may have multiple roles in sustaining AML blasts 1,3 MCL-1 is a member of the apoptosis-regulating BCL-2 family of proteins. 8 In normal function, MCL-1 is essential for early embryonic development and for the survival of multiple cell lineages, including lymphocytes and hematopoietic stem cells. 3 However, in MCL-1–dependent AML, MCL-1 has been shown to sustain the survival of AML cells, which may lead to relapse. 1 MCL-1 dependence is also associated with resistance to agents that otherwise have activity against leukemic blasts. 8 MCL-1 expression Because of the short half-life of MCL-1 (2-4 hours), the effects of targeting upstream pathways are expected to reduce MCL-1 levels rapidly. 11 CDK9 inhibition has been shown to block MCL-1 transcription, resulting in the rapid downregulati