ArtView November 2015 | Page 48

in the score, but they also weren't outlawed. They were different to what other people were doing. If you listen to say 30 recordings of this piece, starting with Richter then Horowitz then Gilels, they're all so drastically different. Richter plays it in this quite austere Russian way - does that mean its wrong? Not at all, but it's certainly not the way I wanted to play it. I still admired it and I'm still very much in awe of the great master. more famous than the piano version. So to what extent do we look at the version that was written after the piano version was created as some kind of benchmark, or as some kind of prototype? I was working with a coach on this whole process, and she was like oh, an orchestra wouldn't do that - and I thought of course they wouldn't because it wasn't written (though I didn't say that). But she made a very interesting point. Do you feel there's a progression of different versions or are they just completely in isolation, different interpretations of the same piece? So to what extent does the orchestral version influence your version? I think people's personalities are so different, and back then of course there's the added element that we're talking about the golden age of pianism. It was a time when pianists could be different - and not only could they, but the great pianists were different by virtue of the fact that they were great pianists. Whereas now with recording there's more of a sense of conformity and perfection in a kind of a saline sense. It's very interesting to speculate on that. I approached this piece with a sense of reverence but also creativity, because by writing it Mussorgsky is also inviting the pianist to be a painter. Then there's the added element that the orchestral version has become ubiquitous, even In the end, not at all. I looked at it as a piece that was written for piano and that was so revered by Ravel and others that it was orchestrated. And that's because even though it was written for the piano it was written orchestrally, in terms of the voicing, in terms of the colour and in terms of the structure and the architecture. I looked at it as a piano piece and I played it as a piano piece because I didn't want to be constrained. As a performer - you started learning piano when you were 5 years old, and I think you had your Opera House debut at 9 years old... Technically I was 8, but who's counting?