ArtView February 2016 | Page 9

other. This was writing that seemed real and alive. Park’s gritty realism and her gift for detail seemed to me a literary feast. This was how I hoped to write one day. On the same drive I picked up another school book. Jane Austen’s Emma, and again I was gone. I was in London for the season, back in the draughty country house, and expecting guests for tea. I fell in love with the writing. I couldn’t work out how Austen did it. I tried to pay attention to her writing; see the mechanism behind it, but I was too transfixed by Austen’s language, her deftness at summing up – and scoffing at – social mores. They were such different books, yet they combine in my memory as a turning point for me as a reader and hopeful writer. If I could write like either of these women, I thought; if I could create such complete and engrossing characters and worlds, then I could become the author I hoped to be. I became compulsive about reading everything both authors had written, and continued this pattern with other favourite writers for several years. Now in my 40s I have a growing list of literary favourites. Most recently it’s been Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea. Until last year I’d never read Hemingway, had no idea of the mesmerising beauty of his prose. The way in which he writes so simply, and yet swings such a mighty literary punch. The book is short, yet it contains a lifetime of hopes and hardship, failures and dreams. It holds an entire ocean, yet pauses to capture the glistening of a tear in an old man’s eye. I read it aloud to my class of primary-age writing students last year, and they were transfixed. They begged me to keep going when it was time to leave. michellehamer.com.au wordsmithsworkshops.com.au