Arts & International Affairs: Volume 2, Issue 1 | Page 98
were transparent. This may be best illustrated by the efforts invested in a
successful standardization of national languages, which enabled functional
communication within national borders. Artistic productions tended to be
aimed at people with more cultivated tastes and this became the standardized
framework for communication between general audiences and artists. More
or less harmonized behavioral values enabled the generalized and widely
accepted evaluation of various cultural products, but also helped artists and
creators to pursue more individual ideas, and their creativity resulted in
the development of new cultural values and meanings. Cultures used to be
financed nationally, either through public funds or individual donations,
always promoting the cultural values as public values.
Today such a national structure of cultures is being dissolved. In parallel,
attitudes toward culture and the arts are changing and are evolving toward
deinstitutionalization of cultural productivity and individualization of
cultural consumption. Contemporary cultures have been actively included
and exposed to radical changes in cultural production, which could
symbolically be interpreted as a transition from the national to the global
cultural contexts that are being re-created through the interaction of cultural
creativity with all other human activities. In the process, the notion of culture
has widened and has become almost all-encompassing. In this respect Terry
Eagleton (����:��, ��) notes that a critical self-reflection of culture makes
it inclusive of practically everything (“…lust, arts, language, media, body,
gender, ethnicity…”).
As globalization has activated the restructuring of national cultures, it has
become possible to understand its dynamics and some of the outcomes of the
ongoing cultural changes. The national and global contexts have provided a
framework for a new cultural environment symbolized by a notion of cultural
space (Harvey ����). The concept of a specialized space (Storper ����:��-��)
and the concept of a cultural space (Švob-Đokić ����:���) are derived from
analyses of cultural globalization (Beck and Grande ����), understood as an
ongoing process that is open to creative efforts expressed through symbolic
signs and content. Various possible interpretations of culture are not made
more complicated by these concepts, but they substantiate its existence,
presence, and development in a certain socio-historical reality and thus,
in practice, reduce a vaguely defined cultural all-inclusiveness to a certain
reality, today called globalism.
Cultural spaces are defined by flexible imaginary aspects (artistic, creative,
anthropological, linguistic, and other, Appadurai ����); they are constructed
97