ARRC Journal 2019 | Page 57

READY FOR TODAY – EVOLVING FOR TOMORROW THE NATURE OF NEWS AND THE MILITARY LEADER: A PRIMER Lieutenant Colonel Adam Hallmark, United States Army Generations of military leaders have been ingrained with Clausewitz’s theory that while war’s character changes with time its nature remains constant. 1 Whilst history demonstrates that military tactics and operational approach tend to lag behind war’s changing character, military leaders nevertheless understand Clausewitz’s theory and instinctively adapt. 2 Today, where the 24-hour news cycle permeates virtually every facet of our lives, Clausewitz’s theory is equally applicable with respect to the character and nature of news. Unlike the military leader’s instinctive adaption to war’s character and nature, history lacks in demonstrating the same insomuch as the character and nature of news are concerned. Instead, it reveals a consistent clash of professions rooted in simple ignorance of one another. The chief result of these fundamental misunderstandings is a mutual mistrust that can lead to awkward interactions between commanders and the media as well as commanders and their designated Public Affairs Officers (PAO) attempting to bring the two together. 3 Such misunderstandings and awkwardness are entirely avoidable. In much the same way that military leaders comprehend the nature and character of war, so, too, must they with regard to the news and, by extension, the mass media. Despite the information revolution that has redefined the character of news during the last 25 years, this essay will not address it. Although unquestionably important, the current character of news is a separate topic entirely and one to be addressed only after the nature of news is made clear. To that end this essay will seek to familiarise the military leader – specifically those reluctant or apprehensive about engaging the media – with a brief history of military- media relations. More importantly, it will seek to impart a basic, fundamental understanding regarding the nature of news and provide an academic lens through which to view, understand and approach civilian media operations by making military leaders aware of two critical communication theories. How Did We Get Here? That military leaders have historically struggled to consider or contend with mass media during operations is nothing new. 4 This is not to say, however, that history is absent of instances where they do. For example, both British Army and American rebel leadership during the American Revolution purposefully waged a war of information against one another in vying – via American colonial mass media – for colonists’ sympathies, This 1770 engraving by Paul Revere depicts a propagandised version of the so-called Boston Massacre. The fake news of its day, it affected colonial sentiments in New England and directly contributed to commencement of the American Revolution in 1775. which were not, interestingly enough, wholly in favour of independence. 5 6 Comparatively speaking, though, these efforts were more akin to psychological operations than anything resembling modern-day Public Affairs operations. 7 1 Carl von Clausewitz, On War, trans. Michael Howard and Peter Paret (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989), https://www.clausewitz.com/readings/OnWar1873/TOC.htm. 2 Williamson Murray, “Military Adaptation in War,” Institute for Defense Analyses, June 2009, http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/dod/ona_murray_adapt_in_war.pdf. 3 Stephanie Oram, “Telling the Story: Impact of Military-Media Relations on the Operational Commander,” (Final, United States Naval War College, 1993). 4 Oram, “Telling the Story”. 5 Robert Parkinson, “Print, the Press, and the American Revolution,” Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of American History, September 2015, http://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/view/10.1093/ acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-9?print=pdf. 6 Douglas Porch, “No Bad Stories: The American Media-Military Relationship,” Naval War College Review 55, no. 1 (Winter 2002), http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/navy/art5-w02.htm. 7 John Snyder, “Seeing through the Conflict: Military-Media Relations,” (Strategy research project, United States Army War College, 2003), 6. ALLIED RAPID REACTION CORPS 57