Archetech Issue 20 2015 | Page 76

LIMESCALE: A NATURAL PHENOMENA THAT COSTS A FORTUNE... One UK Company’s “Alternative” Scale prevention Technology has been assessed by the US Government and it is now recommended that all US government buildings in hard water areas should consider installing it Salt Lake City Courthouse Anyone living in the southern half of England and in many other parts of the world will be fully aware of the effects of Limescale (Calcium Carbonate). There are two methods of dealing with Limescale: ‘chemical’ or ‘physical’. ‘Chemical’ has potential environmental impacts, and in California, now salt based softeners are being banned. More and more the ‘physical’ treatments are gaining traction. Fluid Dynamics is the UK’s oldest manufacturer of physical treatments since it started manufacturing in 1974. Archetech - Issue 20 [Page 76] Most physical conditioners suffer from the criticism that there is no independent verification that they work at all and that is a big drawback. Despite Fluid Dynamics Track record that every new Waitrose and Marks and Spencer, Unilever, Nestle, Kimberley Clark and even the new Louvre Museum in Abu Dhabi are customers, there is a reticence in using the “new technology”. US Government Testing: In 2012 Fluid Dynamics supplied one of their Scaletron units to the General Services Agency, part of the US Government that is responsible for all government buildings. The GSA run a programme to test products that they believe could have a beneficial environmental impact. In the Scaletron’s case, the 18 month test took the form of installation on a boiler in the Salt Lake City courthouse, Utah, with electric elements that were burning out every few months due to scaling. Their Final report states: "The technology showed itself to be effective at preventing the build-up of calcite scale on heating element surfaces in a domestic water system. Further, the build-up prevention was accomplished by the technology and it consumed no energy whatsoever. Also, it added no chemicals to the water stream such as with a salt based water softening system. The technology was cost effective when its initial installation cost was compared to labour and operational savings over the life of the product. In some cases, the simple payback was immediate as both the installed and operating costs were less than a comparably performing salt-based water treatment system. Conclusion: This technology should be considered at any GSA facility with calcification issues.” The full report can be accessed at: www.gsa.gov/portal/mediaId/211899/fileName/GPG_ Findings_19_-_NCWT.action Limetron unit for scale prevention in domestic systems Further Information: Fluid Dynamics: www.scaleprevention.com Scaletron unit for commercial water systems 01628-634073 [email protected]