Annual report 2016 jaarverslag 2016 web | Page 15

Katrien Van Aelst ‘Gender, households and climate change. Adaptation decision-making in the Morogoro Region of Tanzania’ Supervisor: Prof. Nathalie Holvoet Patricia Bamanyaki ‘Evaluating effects of local-level outside government gender budget initiatives in maternal health. An application of theory-based evaluation, process tracing and a quasi experiment in Kabale, Uganda’ Supervisor: Prof. Nathalie Holvoet The IOB PhD in Development Studies attracts a diverse range of students, who currently come from Belgium (13), Germany (3), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (3), Italy (2), Ecuador (1), Cameroon (1), Tanzania (1), Uganda (1), Nicaragua (1), Denmark (1) and the US (1) (see list for details). IOB is continuing to build its PhD training programme. We currently offer six doctoral courses related to the thematic research lines. IOB cooperates with the Netherlands- based CERES Research School’s (Resource Studies for Development) PhD network as a full member. P h D N anneke W inters Contested Connections. Mobility and migration as development experiences of translocal livelihoods in Muy Muy, Nicaragua This thesis aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on migration-development heterogeneity. Taking people’s translocal livelihoods as its starting point, the thesis shows the relevance of integrating a diversity of interconnected yet differentiated (non)migration experiences for understanding global human mobility and its development implications. Migration has been high on the development agenda for decades, and has even been proposed to be included in the 2015 Sustain- able Development Goals (SDGs). However, the links between migration and development have been subject to continuous debate, oscillating between often rather simplistic positive and negative views. This thesis took shape during a time when migration was predominantly seen as a positive instrument for bottom-up develop- ment, especially in terms of remittances. However, the actual heterogeneity of migration-development interac- tions indicates that both migration and development are multi-dimensional and highly contextual phenomena, and should be approached as such in order to deepen our understanding of their interrelatedness. What is more, the capability to decide on migrating (i.e. mobility) as well as the actual act of migration can be seen as forms of development in themselves. To advance the debate on migration-development hetero- geneity, this thesis seeks to further develop this rather novel notion of mobility and migration as development experiences. To do so, the thesis focuses on migrants and their families in Muy Muy, a Nicaraguan village where livelihoods take shape in an insecure context marked by volatility, inequality and marginalisation, and tradi- tionally involve different migrations. These migrations include destinations in Nicaragua, Costa Rica and other Central American countries, the United States and, in- creasingly, Spain. The thesis employs an actor-oriented approach to explore the ways in wich migrants and their families organise their translocal livelihoods, the diversi- ty of migrations they engage in, and the developmental dimensions they deem important. Empirically, the thesis includes a selection of results from a village-wide survey, but its core and analysis mainly rest on multi-sited ethnographic research that extends, along the livelihood connections of migrant families, to Costa Rica and Spain. The thesis seeks to further develop the notion of mobility and migration as development experiences in two ways: first by integrating theoretical insights from transna- tionalism, translocal livelihoods and mobilities research, and second by focusing on the three translocal livelihood domains of carework, ‘illegality’ and remittances. These domains were identified and interrogated through empir- ical research and served as examples of how mobility and migration experiences materialise. These domains also provided the basis for proposing the framework of a mo- bility spectrum. As an analytical tool, the mobility spec- trum framework adds valuable insight to established actor-oriented, contextual and multi-dimensional con- ceptualisations of migration-development. In particular, it enriches our understanding of the fundamentally relational and differentiating aspects of mobility-migra- tion experiences by explicitly integrating a diversity of livelihood connections and the ways they are contest- ed. The mobility spectrum framework provides insight into mobility and migration as time- and place-specific development experiences, as contested connections of translocal livelihoods. As a generative proposal, the mobility spectrum framework pulls together the different insights of the thesis but also further substa