AL'JIHAD : MESSENGERS (Angels & Devil) IN THE SKY (Captured Picture) AL'JIHAD Seventh Edition - Coker College copy - Page 611
7. The statute of limitation started February 25, 20012 after every element of the
Defendant crimes had occurred; with the PLAINTIFF FAIRFAX COUNTY
POLICE DEPARTMENT continue to practice criminal activities in investigation of
Copyright Infringement of AL’JAAUCOA-O Website Logo and Text in using its
contents to profit off the Legal Professional Business as Lawyers. And Plaintiff
FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT continuous opposition to Local,
State, Federal, and International Laws in malice, contempt, perjury, and non-
credibility of court in the FAIRFAX COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT –
TRAFFIC in FAIRFAX, VIRGININA.
8. Your "Miranda Rights" are named after the U.S. Supreme Court case, Miranda v
Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966).
a) When Will The Police Read Me My Miranda Rights?
b) The police must advise suspects of their "Miranda Rights" - their right to remain
silent, their right to an attorney, and the right to an appointed attorney if they are
unable to afford counsel - prior to conducting a custodial interrogation. If a suspect
is not in police custody (i.e., "under arrest"), the police do not have to warn him of
c) The police are very aware of when they have to read suspects their "Miranda
Rights." The police will frequently question a suspect, specifically telling the
suspect, "You are not under arrest, and are free to go. However, we would like you
to answer some questions." After the suspect voluntarily answers questions, and
sometimes if he refuses, he is arrested. The questioning, being voluntary and non-
custodial, is usually admissible. After arrest, the police may have no interest in
further questioning, and thus may not ever read the suspect his "Miranda Rights."
d) If The Police Don't Read Me My Rights, Can They Still Use My Statement?
e) Sometimes, a suspect will make voluntary statements after he is arrested. The police
do not have to warn suspects not to make voluntary statements, as long as they do
not deliberately try to elicit those statements through statements or conduct.
Sometimes, suspects will express their surprise at being caught by the police, with
statements to the effect of, "You got me." At other times, suspects will try to justify
their actions to the police after they are arrested, with statements such as, "I don't
know why I did it," or, "The drugs weren't mine - I was carrying them for a
friend." Those statements, if made spontaneously by a suspect, will almost always be
admissible in court. Additionally, if a statement leads to the discovery of other
evidence, even if the statement itself was taken in violation of the Miranda ruling the
police may be able to use that evidence.
9. Defendant (Pro Se) Imam Mahdi is now informing all parties that this CLASS 1
MISDEMEANOR Offense Tracking Number: 059GM1200012233 has violated
many of the Civil and Human Rights national and international laws.
10. Therefore, Defendant – Imam Mahdi pray that the FAIRFAX COUNTY
GENERAL DISTRICT COURT – TRAFFIC in FAIRFAX, VIRGININA rule in
Defendant - Imam Mahdi favor to dismiss all charges and sponge record for like of
evidence. As a result to the above laws, Defendant Imam Mah